Godoy v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Office et al

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED 20 Findings and Recommendations and Dismissing Action for Failure to Comply with a Court Order signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/31/2019. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

FRANK GODOY,

12

No. 1:17-cv-00809-DAD-GSA (PC)
Plaintiff,

13

v.
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
OFFICE, et al.,

14
15

Defendants.

16

ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND
DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER
(Doc. No. 20)

17
Plaintiff Frank Godoy is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with

18
19

this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

20

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

21

On August 12, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued amended findings and

22

recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed with prejudice due to plaintiff’s

23

failure to obey a court order.1 (Doc. No. 20.) The findings and recommendations were served on

24

plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14)

25

/////

26
27
28

1

Earlier findings and recommendations issued on June 25, 2019 (Doc. No. 19) were amended on
August 12, 2019 to reflect that this case should be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to comply
with a court order, not due to plaintiff’s failure to state a claim.
1

1

days after service. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff has failed to file objections to the pending findings and

2

recommendations and the deadline to do so has passed.

3

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the undersigned has

4

conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

5

undersigned concludes that the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and

6

proper analysis.

7

Accordingly,

8

1.

9

The findings and recommendations filed on August 12, 2019 (Doc. No. 20) are
adopted in full;

10

2.

This action is dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to obey a court order; and

11

3.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 31, 2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2