Briggs v. Enriquez

Filing 2

ORDER TRANSFERRING Case to the Central District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/20/17. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHNNY LEE BRIGGS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 1:17-cv-00814-EPG (PC) ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA T. ENRIQUEZ, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity 20 jurisdiction, be brought only in A(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all 21 defendants reside in the same state, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events 22 or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the 23 subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if 24 there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought.@ 28 U.S.C. ' 1391(b). 25 In this case, none of the defendants reside in this district. The claim arose in San Luis 26 Obispo County, which is in the Central District of California. Therefore, plaintiff=s claim should 27 have been filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In the 28 interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong district to the 1 1 correct district. See 28 U.S.C. ' 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 2 1974). 3 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 20, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?