Jorgenson v. Moore et al
Filing
86
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 85 Motion for Inmate Assistance at Status Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/23/19. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
PAUL JORGENSON,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
Case No. 1:17-cv-00817-LJO-EPG (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR INMATE ASSISTANCE AT STATUS
CONFERENCE
(ECF NO. 85)
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
Paul Jorgenson (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
20
in this action. On August 15, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion asking the Court to allow inmate
21
Raymond Clifton (a paralegal) to represent him, or assist him, at the upcoming status conference.
22
(ECF No. 85). Plaintiff states that he needs the assistance because he has a full-time job teaching
23
high school, Microsoft Office, and various adult continuing education courses. He does not have
24
time to study law.
25
Plaintiff’s motion will be denied. It does not appear that inmate Raymond Clifton has an
26
active State Bar license. Accordingly, he may not represent Plaintiff in court proceedings. Cal. Bus.
27
& Prof. Code § 6125. As to Plaintiff’s request to have inmate Raymond Clifton assist him,
28
Plaintiff has not alleged that he lacks the mental capacity to represent himself at the conference.
1
1
Instead, Plaintiff has alleged that he is too busy to adequately represent himself. This is not a
2
valid reason for the Court to order Plaintiff’s institution to make someone available to represent
3
him at the conference.
4
5
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for inmate assistance at the
upcoming status conference is DENIED.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 23, 2019
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?