Jorgenson v. Moore et al

Filing 86

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 85 Motion for Inmate Assistance at Status Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 8/23/19. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 PAUL JORGENSON, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Case No. 1:17-cv-00817-LJO-EPG (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INMATE ASSISTANCE AT STATUS CONFERENCE (ECF NO. 85) Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Paul Jorgenson (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 20 in this action. On August 15, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion asking the Court to allow inmate 21 Raymond Clifton (a paralegal) to represent him, or assist him, at the upcoming status conference. 22 (ECF No. 85). Plaintiff states that he needs the assistance because he has a full-time job teaching 23 high school, Microsoft Office, and various adult continuing education courses. He does not have 24 time to study law. 25 Plaintiff’s motion will be denied. It does not appear that inmate Raymond Clifton has an 26 active State Bar license. Accordingly, he may not represent Plaintiff in court proceedings. Cal. Bus. 27 & Prof. Code § 6125. As to Plaintiff’s request to have inmate Raymond Clifton assist him, 28 Plaintiff has not alleged that he lacks the mental capacity to represent himself at the conference. 1 1 Instead, Plaintiff has alleged that he is too busy to adequately represent himself. This is not a 2 valid reason for the Court to order Plaintiff’s institution to make someone available to represent 3 him at the conference. 4 5 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for inmate assistance at the upcoming status conference is DENIED. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 23, 2019 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?