Jorgenson v. Moore et al

Filing 90

ORDER Following Status Conference; ORDER Directing Clerk to Send Plaintiff a Copy of the Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of the United States' Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Judgment on the Pleadings re [75-1], signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/10/19. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

PAUL JORGENSON,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

Case No. 1:17-cv-00817-LJO-EPG (PC)
ORDER FOLLOWING STATUS
CONFERENCE

v.

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND
PLAINTIFF A COPY OF THE
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND
AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF THE
UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, JUDGMENT ON THE
PLEADINGS (ECF NO. 75-1)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

Paul Jorgenson (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

16
17

pauperis in this action.

18

The Court held a status conference on September 9, 2019. Plaintiff telephonically

19

appeared on his own behalf. Counsel Edward Olsen personally appeared on behalf of

20

defendant United States of America. Counsel Carlos Ambriz telephonically appeared on behalf

21

of defendant Haak. Counsel Thomas Gray telephonically appeared on behalf of defendants

22

Randhawa and Emanuel Medical Center.

23
24
25
26
27

At the conference, the parties discussed several deadlines that Plaintiff has already missed.
Defense counsel objected to any further extension of these deadlines. In the abundance of caution,
for the reasons stated on the record at the conference, the Court is giving Plaintiff one final
opportunity for Plaintiff to submit certain information and pleadings. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED
that:

28
1

1

1. Plaintiff has thirty days from the date of service of this order to file a motion to

2

substitute named defendants in place of Doe Defendants. Failure to file a motion to

3

substitute by this deadline may result in dismissal of Doe Defendants.

4

2. Within thirty days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall serve

5

Defendants’ counsel (Mr. Olsen, Mr. Ambriz, and Mr. Gray) with his initial

6

disclosures. As discussed in the Court’s prior order (ECF No. 44), Plaintiff shall

7

provide Defendants’ counsel with “[t]he name and, if known, the address and

8

telephone number of each individual likely to have discoverable information−along

9

with the subjects of that information−that [Plaintiff] may use to support [his] claims

10

or defenses, unless the use would be solely for impeachment.” (Id. at 2). Plaintiff

11

shall also provide Defendants’ counsel with a “copy−or a description by category

12

and location−of all documents, electronically stored information, and tangible things

13

that [Plaintiff] has in [his] possession, custody, or control and may use to support

14

[his] claims or defenses, unless the use would be solely for impeachment.” (Id.)

15

3. Plaintiff has thirty days from the date of service of this order to file a response to the

16

United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, Judgment on

17

the Pleadings (ECF No. 75).

18

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the Memorandum of Points

19

and Authorities in Support of the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment or,

20

in the alternative, Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 75-1).

21

5. A schedule will be set at a later date.

22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 10, 2019

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28
2