Ford v. King et al

Filing 3

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:17-cv-1242-KJN) to Fresno (1:17-cv-0822-BAM) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/19/2017. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARREN VINCENT FORD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-1242 KJN P v. AUDREY KING, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The 19 alleged violations took place in Fresno, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States 20 District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d). Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper 21 22 division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the 23 court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court 24 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 26 California sitting in Fresno; and 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 2 2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 3 4 5 Dated: June 19, 2017 6 7 /bh/cw/ford1242.22 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?