Ford v. King et al
Filing
3
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:17-cv-1242-KJN) to Fresno (1:17-cv-0822-BAM) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/19/2017. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DARREN VINCENT FORD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-1242 KJN P
v.
AUDREY KING, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The
19
alleged violations took place in Fresno, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States
20
District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper
21
22
division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the
23
court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court
24
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
26
California sitting in Fresno; and
27
////
28
////
1
1
2
2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be
filed at:
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
3
4
5
Dated: June 19, 2017
6
7
/bh/cw/ford1242.22
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?