Saniefar v. Moore et al

Filing 31

ORDER re Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File First Amended Complaint and for Defendants to File their Response signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/20/2017. The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Plaintiff to file her amended complaint is extended from December 21, 2017 to January 3, 2018, and that Defendants' responsive pleadings shall be filed on or before January 19, 2018. (Valdez, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: service@mission.legal 4 5 6 7 Attorney for Defendants, Mission Law Firm, Moore Law Firm, West Coast CASp & ADA Services, Kenneth Randolph Moore, Geoshua Levinson, Rick D. Moore, Ronald D. Moore, Ronny Loreto, Elmer LeRoy Falk, and Marejka Sacks 8 11 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: service@mission.legal 12 Defendant in pro se 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: service@mission.legal Defendant in pro se, erroneously sued as “Zachery M. Best” 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 FATEMEH SANIEFAR, Plaintiff, 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. RONALD D. MOORE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:17-cv-00823-LJO-BAM STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR RESPONSE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 WHEREAS, on December 1, 2017, the Court granted the motions of Defendants 2 Kenneth Randolph Moore, Geoshua Levinson, West Coast CASp & ADA Services, Rick D. 3 Moore; Tanya E. Moore, Zachary M. Best (erroneously sued herein as “Zachery M. Best”), 4 Mission Law Firm, Moore Law Firm, Ronald D. Moore, Ronny Loreto, Elmer LeRoy Falk, and 5 Marejka Sacks (collectively referred to herein as “Defendants”) to dismiss the Complaint filed 6 by Plaintiff Fatemeh Saniefar (“Plaintiff,” and together with Defendants, “the Parties”) with 7 leave to amend and allowing Plaintiff 20 days from the date of the order to file an amended 8 complaint (Dkt. 29); 9 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s amended complaint would therefore be due on December 21, 10 2017, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), Defendants’ responsive 11 response would be due within 14 days or by January 4, 2018; and 12 13 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to an alternative briefing schedule in light of the holidays and counsels’ availability. 14 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate 15 that the time for Plaintiff to file her amended complaint be extended from December 21, 2017 16 to January 3, 2018, and that Defendants’ response to the amended complaint be filed on or 17 before January 19, 2018. 18 19 Dated: December 18, 2017 20 /s/ Moji Saniefar Moji Saniefar Attorneys for Plaintiff Fatemeh Saniefar 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SANIEFAR LAW Dated: December 18, 2017 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Defendants Mission Law Firm, Moore Law Firm, West Coast CASp & ADA Services, Kenneth Randolph Moore, Geoshua Levinson, Rick D. Moore, Ronald D. Moore, Ronny Loreto, Elmer LeRoy Falk, and Marejka Sacks 1 Dated: December 18, 2017 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Defendant in pro se Dated: December 18, 2017 /s/ Zachary M. Best Zachary M. Best Defendant in pro se, erroneously sued as “Zachery M. Best” 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ORDER The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Plaintiff to file her amended complaint is extended from December 21, 2017 to January 3, 2018, and that Defendants’ responsive pleadings shall be filed on or before January 19, 2018. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 20, 2017 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?