Saniefar v. Moore et al
Filing
31
ORDER re Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File First Amended Complaint and for Defendants to File their Response signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/20/2017. The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Plaintiff to file her amended complaint is extended from December 21, 2017 to January 3, 2018, and that Defendants' responsive pleadings shall be filed on or before January 19, 2018. (Valdez, E)
1
2
3
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: service@mission.legal
4
5
6
7
Attorney for Defendants,
Mission Law Firm, Moore Law Firm,
West Coast CASp & ADA Services,
Kenneth Randolph Moore, Geoshua Levinson,
Rick D. Moore, Ronald D. Moore, Ronny Loreto,
Elmer LeRoy Falk, and Marejka Sacks
8
11
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: service@mission.legal
12
Defendant in pro se
9
10
13
14
15
16
17
Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: service@mission.legal
Defendant in pro se,
erroneously sued as “Zachery M. Best”
18
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
22
FATEMEH SANIEFAR,
Plaintiff,
23
24
25
26
27
28
vs.
RONALD D. MOORE, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:17-cv-00823-LJO-BAM
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE
TO FILE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND FOR DEFENDANTS
TO FILE THEIR RESPONSE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
WHEREAS, on December 1, 2017, the Court granted the motions of Defendants
2
Kenneth Randolph Moore, Geoshua Levinson, West Coast CASp & ADA Services, Rick D.
3
Moore; Tanya E. Moore, Zachary M. Best (erroneously sued herein as “Zachery M. Best”),
4
Mission Law Firm, Moore Law Firm, Ronald D. Moore, Ronny Loreto, Elmer LeRoy Falk, and
5
Marejka Sacks (collectively referred to herein as “Defendants”) to dismiss the Complaint filed
6
by Plaintiff Fatemeh Saniefar (“Plaintiff,” and together with Defendants, “the Parties”) with
7
leave to amend and allowing Plaintiff 20 days from the date of the order to file an amended
8
complaint (Dkt. 29);
9
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s amended complaint would therefore be due on December 21,
10
2017, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), Defendants’ responsive
11
response would be due within 14 days or by January 4, 2018; and
12
13
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to an alternative briefing schedule in light of the
holidays and counsels’ availability.
14
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate
15
that the time for Plaintiff to file her amended complaint be extended from December 21, 2017
16
to January 3, 2018, and that Defendants’ response to the amended complaint be filed on or
17
before January 19, 2018.
18
19
Dated: December 18, 2017
20
/s/ Moji Saniefar
Moji Saniefar
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Fatemeh Saniefar
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SANIEFAR LAW
Dated: December 18, 2017
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Defendants
Mission Law Firm, Moore Law Firm, West
Coast CASp & ADA Services, Kenneth
Randolph Moore, Geoshua Levinson, Rick
D. Moore, Ronald D. Moore, Ronny
Loreto, Elmer LeRoy Falk, and Marejka
Sacks
1
Dated: December 18, 2017
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Defendant in pro se
Dated: December 18, 2017
/s/ Zachary M. Best
Zachary M. Best
Defendant in pro se,
erroneously sued as “Zachery M. Best”
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ORDER
The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Plaintiff to file her amended complaint is
extended from December 21, 2017 to January 3, 2018, and that Defendants’ responsive
pleadings shall be filed on or before January 19, 2018.
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: December 20, 2017
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?