Callins v. Stainer et al

Filing 48

ORDER following Initial Scheduling Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/11/2019. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARLTON R. CALLINS, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:17-cv-00840-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER FOLLOWING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE v. C. PFEIFFER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Carlton Callins (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 18 in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 11, 2019, the Court 19 held an Initial Scheduling Conference (“Scheduling Conference”). Plaintiff telephonically 20 appeared on his own behalf. Counsel Robert Perkins and Jon Allin telephonically appeared on 21 behalf of Defendants. 22 Based on input from the parties, and for the reasons discussed on the record, the Court 23 determined that the issue of exhaustion of available administrative remedies should be decided 24 before the case proceeds further. 25 26 27 Accordingly, for the reasons stated on the record at the Scheduling Conference, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The case is stayed, except for the issue of exhaustion of available administrative 28 1 1 remedies. 2 2. Discovery is opened only as to the issue of exhaustion of available 3 administrative remedies. Responses to discovery requests are due within thirty 4 days after service of the request. 5 3. Defendants have until November 22, 2019, to file a motion for summary 6 judgment on the basis that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his available administrative 7 remedies, or to file a statement that they are waiving their exhaustion defense. If 8 Defendants file a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff’s opposition is due 9 December 20, 2019, and Defendants’ reply is due January 15, 2020. 10 4. The Court will issue a further schedule once the issue of exhaustion is decided, 11 or upon further order of the Court. 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 11, 2019 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?