Smith v. Stanislaus Co. Sheriff's Dept., et al.
Filing
8
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 7 Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/1/17. (Attachments: # 1 Amended Complaint Form) (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TYRONE SMITH,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF=S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
v.
STANISLAUS COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
(Doc. 7)
Defendants.
16
17
No. 1:17-cv-00847-AWI-JLT (PC)
Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking leave to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 7.)
18
Because Plaintiff has not previously amended his complaint and defendants have not filed a
19
responsive pleading, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint without permission from the Court.
20
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Plaintiff is informed that if he files a new pleading, the amended complaint
21
supercedes the original complaint. Lacey v. Maricopa County, Nos. 09-15806, 09-15703, 2012
22
WL 3711591, at *1 n.1 (9th Cir. Aug. 29, 2012) (en banc). Thus, the amended complaint must be
23
“complete in itself without reference to the prior or superceded pleading.” Local Rule 220.
24
25
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to amend is GRANTED, though the Court’s permission is
unnecessary. The Clerk’s Office is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form.
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 1, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?