Bethel v. Cashman, et al.
ORDER Approving Stipulation of the Parties to Dismiss Defendants, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/21/17. Service Team Inc. (a Nevada corporation), Robert Lynn Cashman (an individual) and Hallmark Venture Group, Inc. (a Nevada corporation) terminated. (Martin-Gill, S)
MACDONALD | FERNANDEZ LLP
Reno F.R. Fernandez III (SBN 251934)
914 Thirteenth Street
Modesto, CA 95354
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Penelope C. Bethel
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PENELOPE C. BETHEL, Individually and
for the Estate of ROY P. BETHEL,
Case No. 1:17-cv-00862-LJO-BAM
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF
THE PARTIES TO DISMISS
ROBERT LYNN CASHMAN, an
individual; HUMBLE ENERGY, INC., a
Nevada corporation; HALLMARK
VENTURE GROUP, INC., a Nevada
corporation; SERVICE TEAM INC., a
Nevada corporation; and SPORT STIX
INC., a Nevada corporation,
Having considered the stipulation (the “Stipulation”) entered into by and between Plaintiff
PENELOPE C. BETHEL and Defendants ROBERT LYNN CASHMAN, HALLMARK
VENTURE GROUP, INC. and SERVICE TEAM INC. (herein “Answering Defendants”), for
dismissal of the Answering Defendants from the within matter.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
The Stipulation between Plaintiff PENELOPE C. BETHEL and Defendants
ROBERT LYNN CASHMAN, HALLMARK VENTURE GROUP, INC. and SERVICE TEAM
INC. is approved;
All claims against Answering Defendants ROBERT LYNN CASHMAN,
HALLMARK VENTURE GROUP, INC. and SERVICE TEAM INC. are hereby dismissed from
the within action with prejudice pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii);
This Court shall and does retain jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement
(as that term is defined in the Stipulation);
Each party will bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 21, 2017
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?