Bethel v. Cashman, et al.

Filing 23

ORDER Approving Stipulation of the Parties to Dismiss Defendants, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/21/17. Service Team Inc. (a Nevada corporation), Robert Lynn Cashman (an individual) and Hallmark Venture Group, Inc. (a Nevada corporation) terminated. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 MACDONALD | FERNANDEZ LLP Reno F.R. Fernandez III (SBN 251934) 914 Thirteenth Street Modesto, CA 95354 (209) 521-8100 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Penelope C. Bethel 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PENELOPE C. BETHEL, Individually and for the Estate of ROY P. BETHEL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 v. Case No. 1:17-cv-00862-LJO-BAM ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS ROBERT LYNN CASHMAN, an individual; HUMBLE ENERGY, INC., a Nevada corporation; HALLMARK VENTURE GROUP, INC., a Nevada corporation; SERVICE TEAM INC., a Nevada corporation; and SPORT STIX INC., a Nevada corporation, 18 Defendants. 19 20 Having considered the stipulation (the “Stipulation”) entered into by and between Plaintiff 21 PENELOPE C. BETHEL and Defendants ROBERT LYNN CASHMAN, HALLMARK 22 VENTURE GROUP, INC. and SERVICE TEAM INC. (herein “Answering Defendants”), for 23 dismissal of the Answering Defendants from the within matter. 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. The Stipulation between Plaintiff PENELOPE C. BETHEL and Defendants 26 ROBERT LYNN CASHMAN, HALLMARK VENTURE GROUP, INC. and SERVICE TEAM 27 INC. is approved; 28 1 1 2. All claims against Answering Defendants ROBERT LYNN CASHMAN, 2 HALLMARK VENTURE GROUP, INC. and SERVICE TEAM INC. are hereby dismissed from 3 the within action with prejudice pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); 4 5 6 7 8 3. This Court shall and does retain jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement (as that term is defined in the Stipulation); 4. Each party will bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 21, 2017 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?