Canada v. Niebert
Filing
30
ORDER Regarding 29 Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/3/2018. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RONALD LEE CANADA,
Case No. 1:17-cv-00873-AWI-BAM (PC)
12
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
13
v.
14
NIEBERT, et al.,
15
(ECF No. 29)
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff Ronald Lee Canada (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
18
forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on
19
June 23, 2017. On December 28, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, with
20
prejudice. (ECF No. 29.)
21
“[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(i), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action
22
prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Commercial
23
Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (quotation and
24
citation omitted). “[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is
25
required, the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can’t complain,
26
and the district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it.” Id. at 1078. No defendant has
27
been served in this action and no defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary
28
judgment. Additionally, pursuant to Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal, the dismissal is with
1
1
2
prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B).
Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to CLOSE the file in this
3
case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action, with prejudice, under Rule
4
41(a). All pending motions, if any, are terminated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
January 3, 2018
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?