Canada v. Niebert

Filing 30

ORDER Regarding 29 Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/3/2018. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONALD LEE CANADA, Case No. 1:17-cv-00873-AWI-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 13 v. 14 NIEBERT, et al., 15 (ECF No. 29) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Ronald Lee Canada (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on 19 June 23, 2017. On December 28, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, with 20 prejudice. (ECF No. 29.) 21 “[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(i), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action 22 prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Commercial 23 Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (quotation and 24 citation omitted). “[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is 25 required, the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can’t complain, 26 and the district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it.” Id. at 1078. No defendant has 27 been served in this action and no defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary 28 judgment. Additionally, pursuant to Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal, the dismissal is with 1 1 2 prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to CLOSE the file in this 3 case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action, with prejudice, under Rule 4 41(a). All pending motions, if any, are terminated. IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: /s/ Barbara January 3, 2018 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?