Krohe v. Steinhardt
Filing
14
ORDER Relating and Reassigning Cases, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/11/17. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHRISTOPHER DAVID KROHE,
12
13
14
No. 1:17-cv-00878-DAD-MJS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER RELATING AND REASSIGNING
CASES
ZANDRA STEINHARDT,
15
Defendant.
16
17
CHRISTOPHER D. KROHE,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
v.
ZANDRA K. STEINHARDT,
Defendant.
21
22
CHRISTOPHER D. KROHE,
23
24
25
26
No. 1:17-cv-00881-DAD-EPG
No. 1:17-cv-00885-LJO-SKO
Plaintiff,
v.
ZANDRA K. STEINHARDT,
Defendant.
27
28
1
1
2
CHRISTOPHER D. KROHE,
Plaintiff,
3
4
5
No. 1:17-cv-00889-DAD-SKO
v.
ZANDRA STEINHARDT,
Defendant.
6
7
8
9
Review of the court record in above-referenced actions reveals that they are related to
each other under Local Rule 123. These actions involve the same or similar parties, properties,
10
claims, events, and/or questions of fact or law. In addition, the currently assigned district and
11
magistrate judges have not engaged each of the respective actions in any substantial way.
12
Accordingly, assignment of the actions to the undersigned and to Magistrate Judge Michael J.
13
Seng will promote efficiency and economy for the court and parties.
14
An order relating cases under this court’s Local Rule 123 merely assigns them to the same
15
district judge and magistrate judge, and does not consolidate the cases. Good cause appearing,
16
the court orders that the above-referenced actions are to be reassigned to U.S. District Judge Dale
17
A. Drozd and U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng.
18
19
Accordingly, all documents filed in the above-referenced actions shall now bear the
following case numbers:
20
1:17-cv-00878-DAD-MJS
21
1:17-cv-00881-DAD-MJS
22
1:17-cv-00885-DAD-MJS
23
1:17-cv-00889-DAD-MJS
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 11, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?