Krohe v. Steinhardt
Filing
19
ORDER DENYING 18 Motion, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/5/2017. (Lafata, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
CHRISTOPHER DAVID KROHE,
10
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 1:17-cv-00878-DAD-MJS
ORDER DENYING MOTION
(ECF NO. 18)
ZANDRA STEINHARDT,
Defendant.
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff Christopher David Krohe is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
19
forma pauperis in this civil action against Zandra Steinhardt. On August 1, 2017, the
20
undersigned issued findings and recommendations to consolidate several cases filed by
21
Plaintiff with the instant case, and to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction. (ECF No.
22
16.) On August 21, 2017, Plaintiff filed objections. (ECF No. 17.) The findings and
23
recommendation remain pending before the District Judge.
24
Also on August 21, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the Court notify
25
the Attorney General and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of his objections because
26
they also relate to his appeal of a separate matter. (ECF No. 18.)
27
28
1
Plaintiff’s motion is HEREBY DENIED. The Attorney General is not a party to this
2
suit and the matter has not been appealed. If Plaintiff wishes to present his arguments to
3
the Ninth Circuit, he must file a brief in his pending appeal, and he may serve that brief
4
on the Attorney General. Such action does not require, nor warrant, intervention from
5
this Court.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 5, 2017
/s/
9
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?