Hopson v. Ron Simi, Inc. et al
Filing
9
ORDER Discharging Order to Show Cause and GRANTING Plaintiff's Request for Continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for 9/26/2017 to 11/21/2017 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/21/2017. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
FRESNO DIVISION
8
9
10 CYNTHIA HOPSON,
Case No.: 1:17-cv-00879-LJO-SAB
11
12
13
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF
MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
PLAINTIFF,
v.
(ECF Nos. 7, 8)
14 RON SIMI, INC., et al.,
15
16
DEFENDANTS.
17
18
On September 20, 2017, an order was filed requiring Plaintiff to show cause by the close of
19
business why sanctions should not issue for the failure to file a joint statement in compliance with
20
the Court’s July 5, 2017 order setting the mandatory scheduling conference. Plaintiff did not
21
respond to the order to show cause.
On September 21, 2017, Plaintiff filed a request for a
22
23
continuance of the scheduling conference.
24
In this instance, the Court shall discharge the order to show cause and grant Plaintiff’s
25
request to continue the scheduling conference. However, counsel for Plaintiff is advised that orders
26
are not mere suggestions to which the party may choose to respond. When the Court issues an order
27
requiring an act by a date certain, the party is required to act. Counsel Daniel Joseph Malakauskas is
28
1
1
2
hereby provided with notice that should there be future failures to respond to orders of this Court,
monetary sanctions will issue without further notice.
3
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1.
The order to show cause, filed September 20, 2017, is DISCHARGED;
2.
The mandatory scheduling conference set for September 26, 2017, is CONTINUED
5
6
to November 21, 2017, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9; and
7
3.
8
9
Counsel Daniel Joseph Malakauskas is advised that future failures to respond to
orders of this Court will result in the issuance of monetary sanctions. This shall
10
constitute prior notice for the imposition of future monetary sanctions for failure to
11
comply with orders of this Court.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
Dated:
September 21, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?