Torres v. La Favorita Broadcasting, Inc., et al.
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER to continue Scheduling Conference from 11/9/2017 to 1/23/2018 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. A Joint Scheduling Conference Report is due one week before the new conference date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/6/2017. (Hernandez, M)
1 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard,
Wayte & Carruth LLP
2 Timothy J. Buchanan, #100409
tim.buchanan@mccormickbarstow.com
3 7647 North Fresno Street
Fresno, California 93720
4 Telephone:
(559) 433-1300
Facsimile:
(559) 433-2300
5
Attorneys for Defendants appearing specially
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
RICARDO TORRES, individually and on
11 behalf of LA FAVORITA
BROADCASTING, INC., a suspended
12 California corporation. LA FAVORITA
RADIO NETWORK, INC., a suspended
13 California corporation; KAFY, INC., a
suspended California corporation; KBYN,
14 INC., a suspended California corporation;
KCFA, INC., a suspended California
15 corporation; KSKD, INC., a suspended
California corporation; and KNTO, INC., a
16 suspended California corporation,
17
18
Plaintiff,
v.
19 LA FAVORITA BROADCASTING,
INC., a suspended California corporation.;
20 LA FAVORITA RADIO NETWORK,
INC., a suspended California corporation;
21 KAFY, INC., a suspended California
corporation; KBYN, INC., a suspended
22 California corporation; KCFA, INC., a
suspended California corporation; KSKD,
23 INC., a suspended California corporation;
and KNTO, INC., a suspended California
24 corporation; NELSON F. GOMEZ, an
individual; DEBBIE L. GOMEZ, an
25 individual; and DOES 1 through 10
inclusive,
26
Defendants.
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET
FRESNO, CA 93720
Case No. 17–cv-00888-LJO-SAB
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
CONTINUANCE OF SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
1
Plaintiff and Defendants, and each of them, appearing specially through counsel (having
2 not appeared yet in this action), stipulate as follows:
3
1.
The proofs of service filed on October 16, 2017 in this action (Docs. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
4 12, 13, 14, 15) are without force or effect. The complaint served as shown in those proofs of
5 service was not effectively served.
6
2.
The operative complaint in this action was later served effectively October 18,
3.
Defendants shall have until December 8, 2017, within which to respond to the
7 2017.
8
9 complaint.
10
4.
The parties request that the Court vacate the scheduling conference currently set for
11 November 9, 2017. The parties further request that the Court reset that conference for a date on or
12 after January 15, 2018, at the Court’s availability.
13
5.
This stipulation and proposed order does not constitute a general appearance in this
14 action by any Defendant. The stipulation is entered into and presented as a special appearance
15 solely for purposes of the relief it seeks and for no other purpose.
16
17
18
McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
Dated: November 11, 2017
19
20
/s/ Timothy J. Buchanan
Timothy J. Buchanan
For Defendants, appearing specially solely for
purposes of this stipulation and application
By:
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET
FRESNO, CA 93720
2
1 Dated: November 11, 2017
ABIR COHEN TREYZON SALO, LLP
2
3
/s/ Boris Treyzon
Boris Treyzon
David S. Bederman
Attorneys for Plaintiff RICARDO TORRES
By:
4
5
6
ORDER
7
8
9
The Scheduling Conference is continued from 11/9/2017 to 1/23/2018 at 3:00 p.m. before
10 Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. A Joint Scheduling Conference Report is due one week
11 before the new conference date.
12
13 IT IS SO ORDERED.
14 Dated:
15
November 6, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET
FRESNO, CA 93720
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?