Torres v. La Favorita Broadcasting, Inc., et al.

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT BY ONE WEEK. Accordingly, Plaintiff agrees that Defendants shall have until December 15, 2017 within which to respond to the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/8/2017. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 Boris Treyzon, Esq. (SBN: 188893) 2 3 4 5 6 David S. Bederman, Esq. (SBN: 285262) ABIR COHEN TREYZON SALO, LLP 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 935 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (424) 288-4367 Facsimile: (424) 288-4368 Attorneys for Plaintiff Ricardo Torres 7 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, 8 Wayte & Carruth LLP Timothy J. Buchanan, #100409 9 7647 North Fresno Street 10 Fresno, California 93720 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 (559) 433-2300 12 Attorneys for Defendants, appearing specially 11 Facsimile: 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 RICARDO TORRES, individually and 18 19 20 21 22 23 on behalf of LA FAVORITA BROADCASTING, INC., a suspended California corporation. LA FAVORITA RADIO NETWORK, INC., a suspended California corporation; KAFY, INC., a suspended California corporation; KBYN, INC., a suspended California corporation; KCFA, INC., a suspended California corporation; KSKD, INC., a suspended California corporation; and KNTO, INC., a suspended California corporation, Plaintiff, 24 25 v. 26 LA FAVORITA BROADCASTING, INC., a suspended California 27 corporation.; LA FAVORITA RADIO NETWORK, 28 INC., a suspended California corporation; KAFY, INC., a suspended MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET FRESNO, CA 93720 Case No. 17–cv-00888-LJO-SAB STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT BY ONE WEEK 1 California corporation; KBYN, INC., a suspended California corporation; 2 KCFA, INC., a suspended California corporation; KSKD, INC., a suspended 3 California corporation; and KNTO, INC., a suspended 4 California corporation; NELSON F. GOMEZ, an individual; DEBBIE L. 5 GOMEZ, an individual; and DOES 1 through 10 6 inclusive, Defendants. 7 8 9 Plaintiff and Defendants, and each of them, appearing specially through 10 counsel (having not appeared yet in this action), stipulate as follows: 11 1. Defendants’ deadline to file a responsive pleading in this action 12 currently falls on December 8, 2017; 13 2. The parties are negotiating a stipulation that would stay litigation of 14 this action so that it may be submitted to binding Alternate Dispute Resolution 15 (“ADR”); 16 3. The parties require one (1) week of additional time to negotiate the 17 terms and procedures for ADR, and anticipate that they will reach agreement within 18 such week; 19 4. Accordingly, Plaintiff agrees that Defendants shall have until 20 December 15, 2017 within which to respond to the complaint. 21 5. This stipulation and proposed order does not constitute a general 22 appearance in this action by any Defendant. The stipulation is entered into and 23 presented as a special appearance solely for purposes of the relief it seeks and for no 24 other purpose. 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET FRESNO, CA 93720 2 1 Dated: December 8, 2017 2 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 3 4 /s/ Timothy J. Buchanan Timothy J. Buchanan For Defendants, appearing specially solely for purposes of this stipulation and application By: 5 6 7 8 9 Dated: December 8, 2017 ABIR COHEN TREYZON SALO, LLP 10 11 /s/ Boris Treyzon Boris Treyzon David S. Bederman Attorneys for Plaintiff RICARDO TORRES By: 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 Dated: 17 December 8, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET FRESNO, CA 93720 3 1 ORDER 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET FRESNO, CA 93720 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?