Torres v. La Favorita Broadcasting, Inc., et al.
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT BY ONE WEEK. Accordingly, Plaintiff agrees that Defendants shall have until December 15, 2017 within which to respond to the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/8/2017. (Hernandez, M)
1 Boris Treyzon, Esq. (SBN: 188893)
2
3
4
5
6
David S. Bederman, Esq. (SBN: 285262)
ABIR COHEN TREYZON SALO, LLP
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 935
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (424) 288-4367
Facsimile: (424) 288-4368
Attorneys for Plaintiff Ricardo Torres
7 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard,
8 Wayte & Carruth LLP
Timothy J. Buchanan, #100409
9 7647 North Fresno Street
10 Fresno, California 93720
Telephone: (559) 433-1300
(559) 433-2300
12 Attorneys for Defendants, appearing specially
11 Facsimile:
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17 RICARDO TORRES, individually and
18
19
20
21
22
23
on behalf of LA FAVORITA
BROADCASTING, INC., a suspended
California corporation. LA FAVORITA
RADIO NETWORK, INC., a
suspended California corporation;
KAFY, INC., a suspended California
corporation; KBYN, INC., a suspended
California corporation; KCFA, INC., a
suspended California corporation;
KSKD, INC., a suspended California
corporation; and KNTO, INC., a
suspended California corporation,
Plaintiff,
24
25
v.
26 LA FAVORITA BROADCASTING,
INC., a suspended California
27 corporation.;
LA FAVORITA RADIO NETWORK,
28 INC., a suspended California
corporation; KAFY, INC., a suspended
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET
FRESNO, CA 93720
Case No. 17–cv-00888-LJO-SAB
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’
TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT BY ONE WEEK
1 California corporation; KBYN, INC., a
suspended California corporation;
2 KCFA, INC., a suspended California
corporation; KSKD, INC., a suspended
3 California corporation;
and KNTO, INC., a suspended
4 California corporation; NELSON F.
GOMEZ, an individual; DEBBIE L.
5 GOMEZ, an individual; and DOES 1
through 10
6 inclusive,
Defendants.
7
8
9
Plaintiff and Defendants, and each of them, appearing specially through
10 counsel (having not appeared yet in this action), stipulate as follows:
11
1.
Defendants’ deadline to file a responsive pleading in this action
12 currently falls on December 8, 2017;
13
2.
The parties are negotiating a stipulation that would stay litigation of
14 this action so that it may be submitted to binding Alternate Dispute Resolution
15 (“ADR”);
16
3.
The parties require one (1) week of additional time to negotiate the
17 terms and procedures for ADR, and anticipate that they will reach agreement within
18 such week;
19
4.
Accordingly, Plaintiff agrees that Defendants shall have until
20 December 15, 2017 within which to respond to the complaint.
21
5.
This stipulation and proposed order does not constitute a general
22 appearance in this action by any Defendant. The stipulation is entered into and
23 presented as a special appearance solely for purposes of the relief it seeks and for no
24 other purpose.
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET
FRESNO, CA 93720
2
1 Dated: December 8, 2017
2
McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
3
4
/s/ Timothy J. Buchanan
Timothy J. Buchanan
For Defendants, appearing specially solely
for purposes of this stipulation and
application
By:
5
6
7
8
9 Dated: December 8, 2017
ABIR COHEN TREYZON SALO, LLP
10
11
/s/ Boris Treyzon
Boris Treyzon
David S. Bederman
Attorneys for Plaintiff RICARDO TORRES
By:
12
13
14
15 IT IS SO ORDERED.
16 Dated:
17
December 8, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET
FRESNO, CA 93720
3
1
ORDER
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET
FRESNO, CA 93720
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?