Torres v. La Favorita Broadcasting, Inc., et al.
Filing
26
ORDER discharging Order to Show Cause re 24 , 25 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/16/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICARDO TORRES,
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. 1:17-cv-00888-LJO-SAB
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE
v.
(ECF Nos. 24, 25)
14
LA FAVORITA BROADCASTING, INC. et
al.,
DEADLINE: JANUARY 19, 2018
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
On July 6, 2017, Plaintiff filed this diversity action alleging a failure to allow inspection
19 of corporate records and breach of fiduciary duty. On December 15, 2107, an order issued
20 granting the parties stipulation and Defendants were to file a responsive pleading in this action
21 on or before December 29, 2017. No responsive pleading was filed.
22
On January 9, 2018, an order issued requiring Plaintiff to show cause why this action
23 should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 24.) On January 12, 2018, Plaintiff
24 filed a response to the order to show cause stating that the parties are currently working on a
25 stipulation to submit the matter to arbitration. (ECF No. 25.) The Court shall discharge the
26 order to show cause. However, counsel is advised that orders issued by this Court are not mere
27 suggestions. If the parties are unable to meet the deadlines established by an order issued in the
28 action, the party is required to seek an extension of time prior to the expiration of the deadline.
1
Accordingly, the order to show cause filed January 9, 2018, is HEREBY DISCHARGED,
1
2 and a responsive pleading or stipulation to stay this action shall be filed by January 19, 2018.
3 Failure to comply with this order will result in the issuance of sanctions in this action.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 Dated:
January 16, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?