Torres v. La Favorita Broadcasting, Inc., et al.
Filing
77
ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER PURSUANT TO INFORMAL CONFERENCE (ECF No. 76 ) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the scheduling order is further modified as follows: Non-Expert Discovery Deadline: June 15, 2020. All other dates and aspects of the scheduling order, as previously modified, shall remain in effect. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/16/2020. (Apodaca, P)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
RICARDO TORRES,
Case No. 1:17-cv-00888-SAB
11
Plaintiff,
ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING
ORDER PURSUANT TO INFORMAL
CONFERENCE
12
v.
13
14
LA FAVORITA BROADCASTING, INC., et
al.,
15
(ECF No. 76)
Defendants.
16
17
On June 25, 2019, the scheduling order issued in this action. (ECF No. 62.) Following
18 modification on March 19, 2020, the non-expert discovery deadline currently expires on May 15,
19 2020. (ECF No. 74.) On April 16, 2020, the Court held an informal conference call with the
20 parties to discuss further modification of the non-expert discovery deadline. (ECF No. 76.)
21 Counsel Boris Treyzon and David Bederman appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs, and Timothy
22 Buchanan and Lisa Mann appeared on behalf of Defendants.
(Id.) Based on the matters
23 discussed at the conference and the agreement of the parties, the Court finds good cause to
24 modify the scheduling order to extend the non-expert discovery deadline an additional thirty (30)
25 days.
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the scheduling order is further modified as
1
2 follows:
1.
3
Non-Expert Discovery Deadline: June 15, 2020.
4 All other dates and aspects of the scheduling order, as previously modified, shall remain in
5 effect.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 Dated:
April 16, 2020
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?