McManus v. Yang et al

Filing 11

AMENDED ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action should not be Dismissed for Failure to Comply with a Court Order; Show Cause Response due within Thirty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/20/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DANNY MCMANUS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
MATT JONES, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:17-cv-00892-SAB (PC)
AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER
[ECF Nos. 9, 10]

Plaintiff Danny McManus is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of

19

the United States Magistrate Judge on July 19, 2017. Local Rule 302.

20

On August 9, 2017, the Court issued an order authorizing service of Plaintiff’s complaint, and

21

requiring Plaintiff to fill out and return the USM-285 forms and summonses within thirty days. (Doc.

22

9.) More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to

23

the order. Therefore, on September 19, 2017, the Court issued an order to show cause why the action

24

should not be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to comply with a court order. However, the

25

Court inadvertently failed to provide a deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the order to show cause.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of service

2

of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why the action should not be dismissed, without

3

prejudice, for failure to comply with a court order.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated:

7

September 20, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2