Lipsey v. Guzman
Filing
20
ORDER Adopting 15 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER Dismissing Action; ORDER that Dismissal is Subject to 28 USC 1915(g); ORDER for Clerk to Close Case, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/3/18. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR.,
11
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
M. GUZMAN, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 1:17-cv-00896-AWI-EPG (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(ECF NOS. 12 & 15)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
ORDER THAT DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT
TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)
ORDER FOR CLERK TO CLOSE CASE
17
18
Christopher Lipsey, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
19
pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred
20
to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On March 30, 2018, Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean entered findings and
22
recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed, with Plaintiff’s state law claim
23
being dismissed without prejudice. (ECF No. 15).
24
Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and
25
recommendations. Plaintiff filed his objections on May 11, 2018. (ECF No. 16). Plaintiff filed
26
supplemental objections on May 18, 2018. (ECF No. 19).
27
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
28
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
1
1
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
2
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
3
1.
4
5
on March 30, 2018, are ADOPTED IN FULL;
2.
6
7
Plaintiff’s federal claims are dismissed with prejudice and his state law claim is
dismissed without prejudice;
3.
8
9
The findings and recommendations issued by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean
This dismissal is subject to the “three-strikes” provision set forth in § 1915(g).
Coleman v. Tollefson, 135 S. Ct. 1759, 1763 (2015); and
4.
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 3, 2018
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?