Lipsey v. Kalil, et al.
Filing
3
ORDER TRANSFERRING Case to the Sacramento Division, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/10/17. New Case Number 2:17-cv-01429-AC (PC). (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Case No. 1:17-cv-00897-EPG (PC)
CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR.,
Plaintiff,
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
v.
LIBRARIAN KALIL and LIBRARIAN K.
SPENCER,
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
In his complaint, Plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by Defendants. The alleged
21
violations took place in Folsom, which is part of the Sacramento Division of the United States
22
District Court for the Eastern District of California. Therefore, the complaint should have been
23
filed in the Sacramento Division.
24
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper
25
court may, on the Court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action
26
will be transferred to the Sacramento Division. This Court will not rule on Plaintiff's request to
27
proceed in forma pauperis.
28
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1
1
2
3
4
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
California sitting in Sacramento; and
2. All future filings shall refer to the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be
filed at:
5
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento, CA 95814
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated:
July 10, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?