Long v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al.
Filing
33
ORDER DISCHARGING 31 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ; ORDER GRANTING 30 PLAINTIFF'S Motion for a Subpoena, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 02/17/2021. ( Case Management Deadline: 20-Day Deadline) (Copy of this order mailed to : Matthew M. Grigg as ordered and Subpoena, Amended Complaint 9 , USM 285 Form and (2) copies of this order forwarded to USM-FRS)(Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
14
15
ORDER DISCHARING ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE; AND
Plaintiff,
12
13
CASE NO. 1:17-cv-0898-NONE-JLT (PC)
PHILLIP J. LONG,
v.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR A SUBPOENA
JANE DOE,
(Docs. 30, 31)
Defendant.
16
17
This action proceeds against a single defendant, Jane Doe, on an Eighth Amendment
18
medical indifference claim. (Docs. 11, 12.) Jane Doe is a nurse with the company Corizon Health,
19
Inc., which contracts with the Fresno County Jail to provide medical services to the jail inmates.
20
Plaintiff has twice sought Jane Doe’s identity by serving a subpoena on Corizon Health. In response
21
to his first subpoena, counsel for Corizon Health responded that the subpoena was too vague. The
22
Court then issued an amended subpoena for Plaintiff on April 16, 2020, who provided further
23
details to assist in identifying Jane Doe. (Doc. 26.) Plaintiff recently submitted a filing indicating
24
that counsel for Corizon Health has not responded to the amended subpoena.
25
On January 26, 2021, the Court ordered counsel for Corizon Health to show cause for the
26
failure to respond to a subpoena. (Doc. 31.) Counsel answered to the order, stating that he
27
responded to the subpoena informing plaintiff that he does not have any records within his
28
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
possession, custody, or control that reflect who treated him on July 8, 2016. (Doc. 32.) In light of
this response, the order to show cause will be discharged.
Plaintiff has filed another motion for a subpoena directed to the California Department of
Corrections and Rehabilitation to identify Jane Doe. The Court’s authorization of a subpoena
duces tecum requested by an in forma pauperis plaintiff is subject to limitations. Because
personal service of a subpoena duces tecum is required, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(b),
“[d]irecting the Marshal's Office to expend its resources personally serving a subpoena is not
taken lightly by the court,” Austin v. Winett, 2008 WL 5213414, *1 (E.D. Cal. 2008); 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(d). Limitations include the relevance of the information sought as well as the burden and
expense to the non-party in providing the requested information. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, 45. A motion
for issuance of a subpoena duces tecum should be supported by clear identification of the
documents sought and a showing that the records are obtainable only through the identified third
party. See, e.g., Davis v. Ramen, 2010 WL 1948560, *1 (E.D. Cal. 2010); Williams v. Adams,
2010 WL 148703, *1 (E.D. Cal. 2010). The “Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were not intended
to burden a non-party with a duty to suffer excessive or unusual expenses in order to comply with
a subpoena duces tecum.” Badman v. Stark, 139 F.R.D. 601, 605 (M.D. Pa. 1991). Non-parties
are “entitled to have the benefit of this Court's vigilance” in considering these factors. Id.
Plaintiff motion and the allegations in the pleading are sufficiently specific as to the
information sought: a female nurse who worked at the North Annex Jail division of the Fresno
County Jail on July 8, 2016, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. The identity of this
individual is critical in order for plaintiff to proceed with this action. The motion, however, is
improperly directed to the CDCR, the State of California’s prison system, which is unaffiliated
with the Fresno County Sheriff’s Office, a division of Fresno County. The Court will therefore
construe plaintiff’s motion as seeking a subpoena to be served on the Fresno County Jail.
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:
1. The order to show cause (Doc. 31) is DISCHARGED, and the Clerk of Court is directed
to serve a copy of this order on the following:
28
2
1
2
MATTHEW M. GRIGG
Law Offices of Matthew M. Grigg
1700 N. Broadway, Ste. 360
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
3
2. Plaintiff’s motion for subpoena (Doc. 30) is GRANTED;
4
3. The Clerk of Court shall forward the following documents to the United States
5
6
7
8
9
Marshal (USM):
a. One completed and issued subpoena duces tecum to be served on:
Litigation Coordinator
Fresno County Jail
North Annex Jail
1265 M Street
Fresno, CA 93721
10
b. One copy of the second amended complaint (Doc. 9);
11
c. One completed USM–285 form; and
12
d. Two copies of this order, one to accompany the subpoena and one for the
13
14
15
USM;
4. In completing the subpoena, the Clerk of Court shall list, as described here, the
documents requested:
16
Documents identifying the name of Jane Doe, a female nurse who
17
worked at the North Annex Jail in Fresno, California on July 8, 2016.
18
On that date, plaintiff was housed in Bed # 39 in the D Pod on the
19
fourth floor of the North Annex Jail, his injury occurred in the gym
20
facility on the fourth floor at approximately 2 p.m., and the female
21
nurse would have treated plaintiff between 2 p.m. and 5 p.m.
22
5. Within twenty days from the date of this order, the USM is DIRECTED to serve the
23
subpoena in accordance with the provisions of Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil
24
Procedure;
25
26
6. The USM shall effect personal service of the subpoena duces tecum, along with a copy
of this order and a copy of the second amended complaint, upon the individual/entity
27
28
3
named in the subpoena pursuant to Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
1
and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c);
2
3
7. Within ten days after personal service is effected, the USM shall file the return of
service, along with the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service, and said costs
4
shall be enumerated on the USM–285 form; and
5
6
8. Within thirty days after service is effected, the Fresno County Jail Litigation
Coordinator is directed to serve the responsive documents on plaintiff:
Phillip J. Long
BJ-2973
Ironwood State Prison (“ISP-2)
P.O. Box 2199
Blythe, CA 92226-2199
7
8
9
10
9. Within fourteen days upon receipt of the documents identifying Jane Doe, plaintiff is
11
directed to submit a notice with the Court, upon which he will then be directed to
12
submit documents necessary to effectuate service.
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 17, 2021
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?