Maciel et al v. Bar 20 Dairy, LLC

Filing 37

STIPULATION and ORDER CONTINUING the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 1/17/2019 to 3/14/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/11/2019. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 JOSE MACIEL and ELVIS BONILLA, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated, and as an “aggrieved employee” on behalf of other “aggrieved employees” under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004, Case No.: 1:17-cv-00902-DAD-SKO CLASS ACTION ORDER ON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 17 Plaintiff(s), 18 19 20 21 22 23 (Doc. 36) vs. BAR 20 DAIRY, LLC, a California limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Judge: SHEILA K. OBERTO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendant(s). 24 25 26 Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties (Doc. 36) and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Mandatory Scheduling Conference 27 28 Employee Rights Attorneys 16530 Ventura Bl. Ste 312 Encino CA 91438 (818) 582-3086 Tel (818) 582-2561 Fax SpivakLaw.com 1 Maciel, et al. v. Bar 20 Dairy, LLC, et al. Order on Stipulation to Continue Mandatory Scheduling Conference 1 currently set for January 17, 2019, is hereby CONTINUED to March 14, 2019, at 2 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. 3 The parties shall file their joint scheduling report no later than March 7, 2019. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: January 11, 2019 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Employee Rights Attorneys 16530 Ventura Bl. Ste 312 Encino CA 91438 (818) 582-3086 Tel (818) 582-2561 Fax SpivakLaw.com 2 Maciel, et al. v. Bar 20 Dairy, LLC, et al. Order on Stipulation to Continue Mandatory Scheduling Conference

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?