Maciel et al v. Bar 20 Dairy, LLC
Filing
37
STIPULATION and ORDER CONTINUING the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 1/17/2019 to 3/14/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/11/2019. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
JOSE MACIEL and ELVIS BONILLA,
on behalf of themselves, and all others
similarly situated, and as an “aggrieved
employee” on behalf of other “aggrieved
employees” under the Labor Code
Private Attorneys General Act of 2004,
Case No.: 1:17-cv-00902-DAD-SKO
CLASS ACTION
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE MANDATORY
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
17
Plaintiff(s),
18
19
20
21
22
23
(Doc. 36)
vs.
BAR 20 DAIRY, LLC, a California
limited liability company; and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Judge: SHEILA K. OBERTO
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Defendant(s).
24
25
26
Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties (Doc. 36) and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Mandatory Scheduling Conference
27
28
Employee Rights Attorneys
16530 Ventura Bl. Ste 312
Encino CA 91438
(818) 582-3086 Tel
(818) 582-2561 Fax
SpivakLaw.com
1
Maciel, et al. v. Bar 20 Dairy, LLC, et al.
Order on Stipulation to Continue Mandatory
Scheduling Conference
1
currently set for January 17, 2019, is hereby CONTINUED to March 14, 2019, at
2
9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto.
3
The parties shall file their joint scheduling report no later than March 7, 2019.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
January 11, 2019
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Employee Rights Attorneys
16530 Ventura Bl. Ste 312
Encino CA 91438
(818) 582-3086 Tel
(818) 582-2561 Fax
SpivakLaw.com
2
Maciel, et al. v. Bar 20 Dairy, LLC, et al.
Order on Stipulation to Continue Mandatory
Scheduling Conference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?