Payne v. State of California et al

Filing 150

ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/26/2023. (Kusamura, W)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

COLEMAN PAYNE
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 1:17-cv-00906-ADA SKO
ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

JOY, ET AL.
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
This case is set for a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on

14
15

June 6, 2023, at 10:00 AM at the U.S. District Court, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California,

16

93721.

17
18

Consideration of settlement is a serious matter that requires thorough preparation prior to
the settlement conference. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

19

1.

20

A settlement conference is more likely to be productive if, before the conference, the

Pre-settlement Conference Exchange of Demand and Offer

21

parties exchange written settlement proposals. Accordingly, at least 3 weeks prior to the

22

settlement conference, counsel for each plaintiff shall submit an updated written itemization of

23

damages and settlement demand to each defense counsel with a brief summary of the legal and

24
25
26
27
28

factual basis supporting the demand. No later than 2 weeks prior to the settlement conference,
each defense counsel shall submit a written offer to counsel for each plaintiff with a brief
summary of the legal and factual basis supporting the offer.
2.

Submission and Content of Confidential Settlement Conference Statements

1

The parties are to send Confidential Settlement Conference Statements (Settlement

2

Statement) to the following email address: [e-mail], to arrive no later than

3

7 days before the conference. Each statement shall be clearly marked “CONFIDENTIAL” with

4

the date and time of the mandatory settlement conference indicated prominently. Each party shall

5

also file a Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement Conference Statement. (See L.R. 270

6

(d).)

7

If the Settlement Conference is continued for any reason, each party must submit a new

8

Settlement Statement that is complete in itself, without reference to any prior Settlement

9

Statements.

10

Each Settlement Statement shall include the following:

11

a.

A brief summary of the core facts, allegations, and defenses, a forthright

12

evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of prevailing on the claims and

13

defenses, and a description of the major issues in dispute.

14

b.

A summary of the proceedings to date.

15

c.

An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery,

16

pretrial, and trial.

17

d.

The nature of the relief sought.

18

e.

An outline of past settlement efforts including information regarding the

19

“Pre-settlement Conference Exchange of Demand and Offer” required

20

above—including the itemization of damages—and a history of past

21

settlement discussions, offers, and demands.

22

f.

23

Conference.

24

3.

25
26

A statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the Settlement

Attendance of Trial Counsel and Parties Required

The attorneys who will try the case and parties with full and complete settlement authority
are required to personally attend the conference.1 An insured party shall appear by a representative

27
28

1

Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements are
subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by

2

1

of the insurer who is authorized to negotiate, and who has full authority to negotiate and settle the

2

case. An uninsured corporate party shall appear by a representative authorized to negotiate, and

3

who has full authority to negotiate and settle the case. It is difficult for a party who is not present

4

to appreciate the process and the reasons that may justify a change in one’s perspective toward

5

settlement. Accordingly, having a client with authority available by telephone is not an acceptable

6

alternative, except under the most extenuating circumstances.2

7

In light of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and the resulting courthouse restrictions,

8

see General Orders Nos. 612–618, the Court will revisit the in-person requirement closer to the date

9

of the settlement conference and reserves the right to modify the requirement depending upon the

10

courthouse restrictions, if any, in place as of June 6, 2023. The parties are advised that while the

11

courthouse restrictions pursuant to General Order No. 618 are in place, Zoom videoconference

12

settlement conferences are available. If the settlement conference will be conducted by Zoom

13

videoconference, the Court will provide the call-in information closer to the time of the settlement

14

conference.

15

The Court expects both the lawyers and the party representatives to be fully prepared to

16

participate. The Court encourages all parties to keep an open mind in order to reassess their

17

previous positions and to discover creative means for resolving the dispute.

18

4.

19

Issues to Be Discussed

The parties shall be prepared to discuss the following at the settlement conference:

20

a.

21

Goals in the litigation and problems they would like to address in the
settlement conference and understanding of the opposing side’s goals.

22
23
24
25

b.

The issues (in and outside the lawsuit) that need to be resolved.

c.

The strengths and weaknesses of their case.

d.

Their understanding of the opposing side’s view of the case.

e.

Their points of agreement and disagreement (factual and legal).

26
27
28

a person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved
in the process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements.
2
Out of town or out of state travel and the purchase of an airplane ticket are not extenuating circumstances.

3

1

f.

Any financial, emotional, and/or legal impediments to settlement.

2

g.

Whether settlement or further litigation better enables the accomplishment

3

of their respective goals.

4

h.

Any possibilities for a creative resolution of the dispute.

5

5.

6

The parties are expected to address each other with courtesy and respect, and are

7

encouraged to be frank and open in their discussions. Statements made by any party during the

8

settlement conference are not to be used in discovery and will not be admissible at trial.

9

6.

10

Statements Inadmissible

Pre-Settlement Discussion

Following review of the parties’ Settlement Conference Statements, Magistrate Judge

11

Oberto may hold a brief telephonic discussion prior to the Settlement Conference to discuss the

12

statements should the Court deem it appropriate. The parties will be provided with the date, time,

13

and dial-in number prior to the telephone conference.

14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16

Dated:

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto

January 26, 2023

.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4