Payne v. State of California et al
Filing
159
ORDER Directing the Clerk to Terminate Defendants Joy Lynch and Doctor Marsha McKay signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 08/28/2023. Joy, and Marsha McKay terminated.(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
COLEMAN PAYNE,
12
No. 1:17-cv-00906-ADA-SKO
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO
TERMINATE DEFENDANTS JOY LYNCH
AND DOCTOR MARSHA MCKAY
v.
14
15
JOY LYNCH, et al.,
(Doc. 158)
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
On August 26, 2023, the parties filed a Stipulation of Dismissal as to Defendants Joy Lynch
20
and Doctor Marsha McKay with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). (Doc.
21
158.)
22
In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows:
23
25
[A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of
dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for
summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have
appeared.
26
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). “The plaintiff may dismiss some or all of the defendants, or some or
27
all of [their] claims, through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice,” and the dismissal “automatically terminates
24
28
1
the action as to the defendants who are the subjects of the notice.” Wilson v. City of San Jose,
2
111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).
3
Because the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice under Rule 41(a), this case
4
has automatically terminated as to Defendants Joy Lynch and Doctor Marsha McKay. Fed. R. Civ.
5
P. 41(a)(1)(A). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE Defendants Joy Lynch
6
and Doctor Marsha McKay.
7
8
This case shall remain OPEN pending resolution of Plaintiff’s case against the remaining
defendant, California Forensic Medical Group.
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
August 28, 2023
.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?