Payne v. State of California et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION and ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT JOY LYNCH AKA NURSE JOY'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/23/2018. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Theodore Slater , Esq., SBN 267479 SLATER LAW, APC 1017 L. St. #294 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (818) 970-2241 Facsimile: (818) 804-3470 Email: theoslateresq@gmail.com Attorney for PLAINTIFF COLEMAN PAYNE 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 COLEMAN PAYNE, an individual, Case No. 17-CV-00906-DAD-MJS PLAINTIFF, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, a government entity and state in the United States; DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS, a government agency form unknown; METROPOLITAN STATE HOSPITAL, an entity form unknown; COUNTY OF CALAVERAS, a government entity in the State of California; CALAVERAS COUNTY SHERIFF, a governmental agency of unknown form; CALAVERAS COUNTY JAIL, an entity form unknown; SERGEANT BAILEY, an individual; NURSE JOY, an individual; DOES 1 through 50, inclusive. STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT JOY LYNCH AKA NURSE JOY’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT Judge: Hon. Michael J. Seng Trial Date: None Assigned Action Filed: July 2, 2017 DEFENDANTS. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT NURSE JOY’S RESPONSE DEADLINE -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 STIPULATION Plaintiff Coleman Payne hereby stipulates pursuant to Local Rule 144 to an extension of time for defendant Nurse Joy to appear in this case through March 21, 2018, 28 days after the prospect defendant’s response otherwise would be due under a prior and shorter agreement between the effected parties. Plaintiff is in the process of preparing an amended complaint with additional facts regarding Nurse Joy, and it is anticipated that the appearance by defendant Nurse Joy will be in response to the new pleading. Plaintiff’s counsel has participated in a meet and confer with counsel Jerome Varanini, Esq., who will be counsel for Nurse Joy when her appearance is made. The instant stipulation is a product of that meet and confer and avoids the necessity at this time for the prospective defendant to appear by motion and, thereby, serves the interests of judicial economy in avoiding a law and motion filing as well as the interests of the parties. 13 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 16 DATED: February 23, 2018 SLATER LAW, APC 17 18 19 20 By: /s/ Theodore Slater Theodore Slater, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Coleman Payne 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT NURSE JOY’S RESPONSE DEADLINE -2- 1 Order 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff submits a document denominated “Stipulation of the parties to allow additional time for Defendant Nurse Joy aka Joy Lynch to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint”. It is signed and filed only by Plaintiff, and does not record or reflect Defendant Joy’s agreement to it. Nevertheless, the proposed Order is perceived as entirely favorable to said defendant, and good cause being found, the COURT ORDERS : Defendant Nurse Joy’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s moving papers in this action is shall not expire before March 21, 2018. IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 Dated: February 23, 2018 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT NURSE JOY’S RESPONSE DEADLINE -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?