Payne v. State of California et al

Filing 97

Order re discovery dispute following telephonic conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/20/2019. (Non-expert Discovery due by 10/31/2019) (Rosales, O.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 COLEMAN PAYNE, also known as Allison Coleman, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE FOLLOWING TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE v. COUNTY OF CALAVERAS, ET AL., 13 14 Case No. 1:17-cv-00906-DAD-SKO Defendants. _____________________________________/ 15 16 17 18 ORDER The Court has considered the parties’ letter briefs regarding their informal discovery dispute 19 and heard argument of counsel at the informal discovery dispute conference held on September 20, 20 2019. 21 As discussed with the parties during the informal discovery dispute conference, pursuant to 22 Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff shall supplement her initial disclosures 23 and her responses to the June 29, 2018, interrogatories served by Defendant County of Calaveras, 24 to provide John Payne’s current, updated and correct personal address and telephone number. 25 The Court will extend the non-expert discovery deadline to provide Defendants with 26 sufficient time to conduct the deposition of John Payne after obtaining his current updated contact 27 information, and to allow the parties additional time to conduct discovery generally. The parties are 28 encouraged to conduct their discovery as expeditiously as possible in view of the November 12, 1 2019, settlement conference, to help ensure that the settlement conference will be productive. 2 It is therefore ORDERED that: 3 1. By no later than September 30, 2019, Plaintiff shall supplement her Rule 26 initial 4 disclosures and her responses to the June 29, 2018, interrogatories to provide John Payne’s current, 5 updated and correct personal address and telephone number; and 6 2. The non-expert discovery deadline is hereby EXTENDED to October 31, 2019. All 7 other deadlines in the Court’s March 18, 2019 order continuing the scheduling order deadlines, 8 (Doc. 89), remain unchanged. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: 12 September 20, 2019 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?