Acosta v. Lam et al
Filing
13
ORDER Directing the Clerk of Court to Close Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/13/17. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JOSE ACOSTA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
v.
PHEANG LAM dba HENG HENG
MARKET, et al.,
15
16
Case No. 1:17-cv-00908-DAD-EPG
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE
(ECF No. 12)
Defendants.
On October 9, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice voluntarily dismissing this action. (ECF No.
17
12.) Thus, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i);
18
Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493,
19
1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may
20
terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”).
21
Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 13, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?