Acosta v. Phuong et al
Filing
8
STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for an extension of time to 9/28/2017 for defendants to file their responsive pleadings. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/12/2017. (Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
KEITH M. WHITE #188536
COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP
Attorneys at Law
499 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 116
Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: (559) 248-4820
Facsimile: (559) 248-4830
Attorneys for Defendants,
CHU PHUONG dba LINDA SEAFOOD
MARKET; BLUE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSE ACOSTA
Case No. 1:17-cv-00915-LJO-EPG
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
14
SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CHU PHUONG dba LINDA SEAFOOD
MARKET; BLUE FAMILY LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP;
15
16
Defendants.
17
18
Defendants CHU PHUONG dba LINDA SEAFOOD MARKET; and BLUE FAMILY
19
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (collectively “Defendants”), and Plaintiff JOSE ACOSTA
20
(“Plaintiff,” and together with Defendants, “the Parties”), by and through their respective
21
attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:
22
WHEREAS, the Parties previously stipulated to extend Defendants’ responsive
23
pleading deadline to September 8, 2017 (Dkt. 6), but now wish additional time to attempt
24
resolution of the matter without incurring fees and costs associated with filing responsive
25
pleadings as they are cautiously optimistic that continued settlement discussions will fully
26
resolve Plaintiff’s claims;
27
///
28
///WHEREAS, the Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this matter is currently set for
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
1
2
3
October 12, 2017;
WHEREAS, the parties wish to conserve attorneys’ fees as well as the Court’s
resources with a matter that will likely be informally resolved;
4
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate as follows:
5
1.
That Defendants’ time to respond to the Complaint be further extended to
6
September 28, 2017, which extension exceeds 28 days from the initial deadline but will not
7
affect any other event or deadline set by Court order, including the Scheduling Conference.
8
9
Dated: September 8, 2017
MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.
10
11
By: /s/ Zachary M. Best
ZACHARY M. BEST
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOSE ACOSTA
12
13
14
Dated: September 8, 2017
COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP
15
16
By:
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
/s/ Keith M. White
KEITH M. WHITE
Attorneys for Defendants
CHU PHUONG dba LINDA SEAFOOD
MARKET; BLUE FAMILY LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
ORDER
1
2
3
4
The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants may have to and including September 28,
2017 within which to file their responsive pleadings.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated:
September 12, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?