Herbrand v. Ditech Financial, LLC

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND DEFENDANTS RESPONSE DEADLINE. The deadline for defendant Ditech Financial LLC to respond to the First Amended Complaint of plaintiff Marcus Herbrand is extended to October 28, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/4/2017. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LOCKE LORD LLP Regina J. McClendon (SBN 184669) rmcclendon@lockelord.com Xiyi Fu (SBN 278274) jackie.fu@lockelord.com 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 318-8810 Fax: (415) 676-5816 Attorneys for Defendant Ditech Financial LLC 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 Locke Lord LLP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100 San Francisco, CA 94104 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 MARCUS HERBRAND, an individual, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, a business entity; ) and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) CASE NO.: 1:17-cv-00921-DAD-SAB STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE DEADLINE Plaintiff Marcus Herbrand (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Ditech Financial LLC (“Ditech”), by and through their respective counsel of record, jointly stipulate and agree as follows: 21 RECITALS 22 1. On August 14, 2017, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint. Dkt. 8. 23 2. On August 18, 2017, this Court issued an order directing Ditech to respond to the 24 25 26 First Amended Complaint on or before September 14, 2017. Dkt. 12. 3. On September 11, 2017, this Court issued an order granting the parties’ stipulation to extend Ditech’s deadline to respond to the First Amended Complaint to October 14, 2017. Dkt. 14. 27 28 1 1 4. The parties are continuing to explore settlement of the litigation, and in connection 2 therewith, stipulate to extend the deadline for Ditech to respond to the First Amended Complaint to 3 October 28, 2017. 4 5. 5 The parties stipulate and agree that the extension request herein is not requested for purposes of delay and will not result in any prejudice to the parties or to the Court. 6 STIPULATION 7 WHEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and agree: 8 1. 9 The deadline for Ditech to file a response to the First Amended Complaint is extended to October 28, 2017. 10 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Locke Lord LLP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100 San Francisco, CA 94104 12 13 Dated: October 4, 2017 Respectfully submitted, LOCKE LORD LLP 14 15 By: /s/ Xiyi Fu Regina J. McClendon Xiyi Fu Attorneys for Defendant Ditech Financial LLC 16 17 18 19 Dated: October 4, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 20 OLYMPIA LAW GROUP 21 22 By: /s/ Hayk M. Grigoryan Matin Rajabov Hayk M. Grigoryan Attorneys for Plaintiff Marcus Herbrand 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filing attorney attests that she has obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this document from the signatories to the document. Dated: October 4, 2017 /s/ Xiyi Fu_________ Xiyi Fu 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Locke Lord LLP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100 San Francisco, CA 94104 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 1 ORDER 2 3 Good cause appearing, the deadline for defendant Ditech Financial LLC to respond to the First Amended Complaint of plaintiff Marcus Herbrand is extended to October 28, 2017. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 7 October 4, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 Locke Lord LLP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100 San Francisco, CA 94104 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?