Severi et al v. County of Kern et al

Filing 101

Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Case Including Defendant, County of Kern With Prejudice; ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/18/19. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4

MARGO A. RAISON, COUNTY COUNSEL
By: Andrew C. Thomson, Chief Deputy (SBN 149057)
Robert J. Rice, Deputy (SBN 131255)
Kern County Administrative Center
1115 Truxtun Avenue, Fourth Floor
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Telephone [phone]

5
6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendants, County of Kern
and Sheriff Donny Youngblood
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

STAN SEVERI and MYRANDA SEVERI, )
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
COUNTY OF KERN; KERN COUNTY
)
SHERIFF DONNY YOUNGBLOOD; in
)
his individual capacity; DEPUTY
)
GABRIEL ROMO, in his individual
)
capacity; and DOES 1 to 100, Inclusive, )
in their individual capacities,
)
Defendants.
)

Case No. 1:17-CV-00931-AWI-JLT
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ENTIRE CASE INCLUDING
DEFENDANT, COUNTY OF KERN WITH
PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
(Doc. 100)

18
19

COME NOW the Parties to this matter, Plaintiff, Stan Severi (hereinafter

20

“Plaintiff”) through his counsel of record, Joel Andreesen and Joseph Whittington of

21

Rodriguez and Associates and Defendant, County of Kern (hereinafter “County

22

Defendant”) through their counsel of record Kern County Counsel’s Office by Andrew C.

23

Thomson, Chief Deputy and Robert J. Rice, Deputy, and provide as follows:

24

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties to this action through

25

their designated counsel, that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in

26

its entirety as to each and every complaint, allegation and/or cause of action against all

27

Defendants, more specifically the dismissal shall include dismissal of the entire action

28

and the applicable complaint of against Defendants County of Kern and Gabriel Romo.
1
Joint Stipulation for a Dismissal of the Entire Action, with Prejudice

1

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the aforementioned dismissal is in

2

consideration of a resolution of the matter by the Parties, and that each party hereby

3

agrees to bear all of its/their own costs and attorney’s fees with respect to this litigation.

4
5

Dated: November _18_, 2019

RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES

6

By: /s/ Joel Andreesen (As authorized on 11/18/19)
Joel Andreesen, Esq.
Joseph Whittington, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Stan Severi

7
8
9
10
11

Dated: November _18_, 2019

MARGO A. RAISON, COUNTY COUNSEL

12
13

By: /s/ Andrew C. Thomson__________________
Andrew C. Thomson, Chief Deputy
Robert J. Rice, Deputy
Attorneys for Defendant, County of Kern

14
15
16
17

Dated: November _18_, 2019

WEAKLEY & ARENDT,
A Professional Corporation

18
19

By: /s/ James Weakley (As authorized on 11/18/19)

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
Joint Stipulation for a Dismissal of the Entire Action, with Prejudice

1

ORDER

2

The parties have settled their case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with

3

prejudice in its entirety. (Doc. 100) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such

4

stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Because all parties who have

5

appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 22), it “automatically terminate[d] the action.”

6

Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is

7

DIRECTED to close this action.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

Dated:

November 18, 2019

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
Joint Stipulation for a Dismissal of the Entire Action, with Prejudice