Severi et al v. County of Kern et al
Filing
16
SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/23/2018. Consent/Decline due within 10 days. Pleading Amendment Deadline 4/25/2018. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 3/26/2018; Non-Expert 1/18/2019; Expert 3/15/2019. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 12/3/2018 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 3/22/2019; Hearing by 4/19/2019. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 3/22/2019; Hearing by 4/19/2019. Settlement Conference set for 1/4/2019 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Pretrial Conference set for 7/16/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Jury Trial set for 9/10/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. The Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/25/2018 is VACATED. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
STAN SEVERI, et al.,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
13
v.
COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:17-CV-0931 AWI JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER1 (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 4/25/2018
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 3/26/2018
Non-Expert: 1/18/2019
Expert: 3/15/2019
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
12/3/2018 at 9:30 a.m.
16
17
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 3/22/2019
Hearing: 4/19/2019
18
19
20
Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 3/22/2019
Hearing: 5/20/2019
21
22
Settlement Conference:
1/4/2019, 9:00 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA
23
24
Pre-Trial Conference:
7/16/2019 at 10:00 a.m.
Courtroom 2
25
26
27
28
1
Because the parties’ positions related to the case schedule are set forth sufficiently in their joint statement, the hearing
on the scheduling conference is VACATED.
1
Trial: 9/10/2019 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 2
Jury trial: 7-10 days
1
2
3
I.
January 25, 2018.
4
5
6
Date of Scheduling Conference
II.
Information Concerning the Court’s Schedule
Out of fairness, the Court believes it is necessary to forewarn litigants that the Fresno Division
7
of the Eastern District of California now has the heaviest District Court Judge caseload in the entire
8
nation. While the Court will use its best efforts to resolve this case and all other civil cases in a timely
9
manner, the parties are admonished that not all of the parties’ needs and expectations may be met as
10
expeditiously as desired. As multiple trials are now being set to begin upon the same date, parties may
11
find their case trailing with little notice before the trial begins. The law requires that the Court give any
12
criminal trial priority over civil trials or any other matter. The Court must proceed with a criminal trial
13
even if a civil trial was filed earlier and set for trial first. Continuances of any civil trial under these
14
circumstances will no longer be entertained, absent a specific and stated finding of good cause. All
15
parties should be informed that any civil trial set to begin during the time a criminal trial is proceeding
16
will trail the completion of the criminal trial.
17
The parties are reminded of the availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct all
18
proceedings in this action. A United States Magistrate Judge is available to conduct trials, including
19
entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, and Local
20
Rule 305. The same jury pool is used by both United States Magistrate Judges and United States
21
District Court Judges. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States Magistrate Judge is
22
taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit. The parties are informed that
23
no substantive rulings or decisions will be affected by whether a party chooses to consent.
24
Finally, the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing
25
United States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant
26
to the Local Rules, Appendix A, reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance
27
notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern
28
District of California.
2
Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to
1
2
conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel
3
SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating
4
whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.
5
III.
Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or
6
7
motion to amend, no later than April 25, 2018.
8
IV.
9
10
11
12
Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)
on or before March 26, 2018.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before
January 18, 2019, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before March 15, 2019.
13
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses2, in writing, on or before February 6,
14
2019, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before February 27, 2019. The written designation of
15
retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),
16
and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in
17
compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered
18
through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
19
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts
20
and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions
21
included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may
22
include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
23
24
25
26
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for December 3, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. before the
Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,
27
28
2
In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health evaluation, the
examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s report fully details the
expert’s opinions in this regard.
3
1
California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the
2
conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
3
The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be
4
completed as well as any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this
5
order. Counsel may appear via teleconference by dialing (888) 557-8511 and entering Access Code
6
1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk receives a written notice of the
7
intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.
8
VI.
Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
9
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later
10
than March 22, 2019, and heard on or before April 19, 2019. Non-dispositive motions are heard at
11
9:00 a.m., before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the United
12
States District Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California.
13
No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned
14
Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good
15
faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the
16
moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate
17
Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the
18
court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,
19
Susan Hall at (661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with
20
Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice
21
and dropped from calendar.
22
In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening
23
time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the
24
notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
25
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via teleconference by dialing (888) 557-
26
8511 and entering Access Code 1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk
27
receives a written notice of the intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before the
28
noticed hearing date.
4
1
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than March 22, 2019, and heard no later
2
than May 20, 2019, in Courtroom 2 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii, United States
3
District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and
4
Local Rules 230 and 260.
5
VII.
6
Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication
At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary
7
adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues to
8
be raised in the motion.
9
The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a
10
question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole or
11
in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the issues
12
for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the expense of
13
briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.
14
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed
15
statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of
16
undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be
17
deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint
18
statement of undisputed facts.
19
In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred
20
as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to
21
comply may result in the motion being stricken.
22
VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date
23
July 16, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2 before Judge Ishii.
24
The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).
25
The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,
26
directly to Judge Ishii's chambers, by email at AWIOrders@caed.uscourts.gov.
27
28
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the
Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.
5
1
The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the
2
Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the
3
Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.
4
IX.
September 10, 2019, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 2 before the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii,
5
6
Trial Date
United States District Court Judge.
7
A.
This is a jury trial.
8
B.
Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 7-10 days.
9
C.
Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
10
California, Rule 285.
11
X.
12
Settlement Conference3
A Settlement Conference is scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on January 4, 2019, located at 510 19th
13
Street, Bakersfield, California. Notwithstanding the requirements of Local Rule 270(b), the settlement
14
conference will be conducted by Magistrate Judge Thurston. The Court deems the deviation from the
15
Local Rule to be appropriate and in the interests of the parties and justice and sound case management
16
based upon the location of the parties. If any party prefers that the settlement conference be
17
conducted by a judicial officer who is not assigned to this case, that party is directed to notify the
18
Court no later than 60 days in advance of the scheduled settlement conference to allow sufficient
19
time for another judicial officer to be assigned to handle the conference.
20
Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall
21
appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority
22
to negotiate and settle the case on any terms4 at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a
23
serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the
24
25
26
27
28
3
Counsel request a settlement conference “before an attorney from the Attorney Settlement Officer Panel under
Local Rule 16-14.4(2).” (Doc. 15 at 5) However, this is not a local rule from this District and the Court does not
maintain such a panel. However, the parties may choose to be referred to the Court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution
Program (L.R. 271) by filing a stipulation.
4
Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements
are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a
person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the
process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible, the representative shall have authority,
if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent demand.
6
1
2
procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.
At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via
3
fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful5 settlement demand which includes a
4
brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the
5
settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or
6
with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is
7
appropriate.
8
9
10
If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their
Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall
not be filed on the court docket.
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
11
12
At least five court days before the settlement conference, the parties shall submit, directly to
13
Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to JLTOrders@caed.uscourts.gov, a Confidential Settlement
14
Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on
15
any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference
16
Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the
17
Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.
18
The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:
19
A.
A brief statement of the facts of the case.
20
B.
A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which
21
the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on
22
the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.
23
C.
A summary of the proceedings to date.
24
D.
An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.
25
E.
The relief sought.
26
27
28
5
“Meaningful” means the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If,
however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should
trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing or vacating the
settlement conference via stipulation.
7
F.
1
past settlement discussions, offers and demands.
2
3
The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of
XI.
Requests for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other
4
Techniques to Shorten Trial
5
Not applicable at this time.
6
XII.
There are no pending related matters.
7
8
Related Matters Pending
XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
9
10
and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any
11
amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently
12
handle its increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as
13
provided in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern
14
District of California.
15
XIV. Effect of this Order
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most
16
17
suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the
18
parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered
19
to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by
20
subsequent status conference.
The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a
21
22
showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations
23
extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by
24
affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause
25
for granting the relief requested.
26
///
27
///
28
///
8
1
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
2
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 23, 2018
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?