Jacquot, et al v. Sunset Square, et al
Order directing the Clerk of the Court to terminate Defendant Sunset Square, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/14/2017. Sunset Square (a General Partnership) terminated. (Rosales, O)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DIERDRE JACQUOT, et al.,
SUNSET SQUARE, a General Partnership,
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
THE COURT TO TERMINATE
DEFENDANT SUNSET SQUARE
(ECF No. 11)
Case No. 1:17-cv-00943-LJO-EPG
On September 13, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of their claims
against Defendant Sunset Square. (ECF No. 11). Thus, the claims against Defendant Sunset
Square have been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111
F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and dismissed without prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493,
1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may
terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”).
Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendant Sunset Square
on the docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 14, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?