Jacquot et al v. Sunset Square et al

Filing 8

ORDER Directing the Clerk of the Court to Terminate Defendant Sunset Square signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 09/14/2017. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

DIERDRE JACQUOT, et al.,

10
11
12
13

Plaintiffs
v.
SUNSET SQUARE, a General Partnership,
et al.,

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
THE COURT TO TERMINATE
DEFENDANT SUNSET SQUARE
(ECF No. 7)

Defendants.

14
15

Case No. 1:17-cv-00946-AWI-EPG

On September 13, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of their claims

16

against Defendant Sunset Square. (ECF No. 7). Thus, the claims against Defendant Sunset Square

17

have been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d

18

688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and dismissed without prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493,

19

1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may

20

terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”).

21
22

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendant Sunset Square
on the docket.

23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 14, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1