Ramirez v. Kitt
ORDER DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP Without Prejudice; ORDER to Submit Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis for a Prisoner, OR Pay Filing Fee Within Forty-Five Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/19/17. (Attachments: # 1 IFP App & Instructions for Prisoner.) (Marrujo, C)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ORDER DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS
APPLICATION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE
(ECF No. 2)
ORDER TO SUBMIT APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FOR A
PRISONER, OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN
FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS
Plaintiff Armando Ramirez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on July 17, 2017. (ECF No. 1.) That
same day, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.)
However, Plaintiff’s form is incomplete. Plaintiff indicated that he has received money
from “family/friends” in the past twelve months, but has not described the amounts received or
indicate whether he expects to continue to receive additional funds, and how much. Plaintiff must
submit a completed form if he wishes for the application to be considered.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED, without
The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order and a blank IFP application
for a prisoner on Plaintiff;
Within forty-five (45) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall
file the attached application to proceed in forma pauperis, completed and signed, or in the
alternative, pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action;
No extension of time will be granted without a showing of good cause; and
Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in
dismissal of this action, without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 19, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?