Buchanan v. Warden et al
Filing
4
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:17-cv-1497-EFB) to Fresno (1:17-cv-0990-SAB) signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/26/2017. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CRAIG BUCHANAN,
12
No. 2:17-cv-1497-EFB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
SHIPMAN, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that eighteen years ago, he acquired the Hepatitis C virus while housed
19
at Corcoran State Prison. ECF No. 1 at 4. He is currently housed at High Desert State Prison
20
(“HDSP”) and names the HDSP Warden as a defendant. Id. at 1. He also names as defendants a
21
doctor employed at Salinas Valley State Prison, and two doctors employed at Corcoran State
22
Prison. Id. at 4. He alleges generally, that “defendants” refused to carry out a treatment plan and
23
violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment. Id. at 5, 6. Although vague, the allegations
24
suggest that plaintiff’s claims arose at Corcoran State Prison, which is in Kings County. Kings
25
County is in the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
26
California, and this action should have been commenced there. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 120(d).
27
Where a civil action has not been commenced in the proper division of a court, the court may, on
28
its own motion, transfer the action to the proper division. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 120(f).
1
1
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that:
2
1. This action is transferred to the Fresno Division.
3
2. The Clerk of Court shall assign a new case number.
4
3. All future filings shall bear the new case number and shall be filed at:
5
6
7
8
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
DATED: July 26, 2017.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?