sbe Licensing, LLC v. HCKUSA, Inc. et al
Filing
12
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within five days of the date of entry of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why this action should not be di smissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file a response in compliance with this order may result in the issuance of sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/13/2017. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SBE LICENSING, LLC,
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD
NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE
v.
9
10
Case No. 1:17 -cv-01043-DAD-SAB
HCKUSA, INC., et al.,
(ECF No. 11)
Defendants.
11
FIVE DAY DEADLINE
12
Plaintiff sbe Licensing, LLC filed this trademark action on August 4, 2017, against
13
14 Defendants HCKUSA, Inc. and Lewis Everk (“Defendants”). (ECF No. 1.) On September 6,
15 2017, an order issued granting the parties stipulation to extend time for Defendants to respond to
16 the complaint until October 3, 2017. The time for Defendants to respond to the complaint has
17 passed and no responsive pleading has been filed in compliance with the September 6, 2017
18 order, nor has Plaintiff filed a request for entry of default.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within five days of the date of entry of this
19
20 order, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for failure to
21 prosecute. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file a response in compliance with this order may
22 result in the issuance of sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this action.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25 Dated:
October 13, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?