Roadrunner Intermodal Services, LLC v. T.G.S. Transportation, Inc.

Filing 136

Joint STIPULATION and ORDER re Notice of Motion to Compel (ECF No. 115 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/22/2018. The parties are HEREBY RELIEVED of any further briefing with respect to TGS's Notice of Motion to Compel (ECF No. 115 ), and the motion is deemed withdrawn without prejudice. (Valdez, E)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 JEFFREY COX, Plaintiff, 4 Case Nos.: 1:17-cv-01207-DAD-BAM, 1:17cv-01056-DAD-BAM (consolidated) v. 5 6 7 8 ROADRUNNER INTERMODAL SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, CENTRAL CAL TRANSPORTATION, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and DOES 1 through 50, JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF 115) Defendant(s). 9 12 ROADRUNNER INTERMODAL SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendant and CounterPlaintiff, v. 13 JEFFREY COX, 10 11 Plaintiff and CounterDefendant. 14 15 16 Judge: Hon. Barbara A. McAuliffe Date: October 4, 2018 Time: 10:00 a.m. Crtrm.: 8 of the Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse ROADRUNNER INTERMODAL SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, 17 18 v. 19 T.G.S. TRANSPORTATION, INC., a California corporation, and DOES 1-10, 20 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF 115) 1 Roadrunner Intermodal Services, LLC (“Roadrunner”) and TGS Transportation, Inc. 2 (“TGS”) (Roadrunner and TGS are collectively the “Parties”) hereby jointly ask the Court to relieve 3 the Parties of any further briefing with respect to TGS’s Notice of Motion to Compel (ECF No. 4 115), given that TGS hereby withdraws the Notice of Motion, without prejudice to its rights to seek 5 further relief should circumstances change. In support of this Stipulation, the Parties state as 6 follows: 7 1. On September 27, 2018, as directed by the Court, the Parties personally appeared to 8 meet and confer to resolve outstanding and impending discovery disputes and establish a schedule 9 for completion of discovery and depositions in this action. 10 2. One dispute under consideration at that time was TGS’ motion requesting an order 11 compelling Roadrunner to re-designate certain produced documents and written discovery responses 12 that had been designated AEO under the Protective Order entered in this action. 13 3. The Parties were unable to reach an agreement to resolve TGS’ motion, and thus the 14 Court ordered Roadrunner and TGS to “each file and service a 5-7-page brief and any exhibits by 15 October 8, 2018, on the issue of removing the AEO designation.” (Order Regarding Discovery 16 Dispute Conference, Dkt. No. 131, at 3.) 17 4. The Court further ordered the Parties to appear for a Telephonic Status Conference 18 on October 4, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., following which the Court issued an order that extended the AEO 19 briefing deadline from October 8, 2018 to October 9, 2018. (Dkt. No. 133.) 20 5. The Parties continued to work cooperatively on the discovery issues addressed at the 21 September 27 conference and continued to meet and confer regarding Roadrunner’s AEO 22 designations—making meaningful progress on that issue. 23 6. Considering the Parties’ continuing, cooperative efforts to resolve the pending AEO- 24 designation issue and progress on that front, the Parties sought and obtained an additional one-week 25 extension of the existing deadline to October 16, 2018, so the Parties could continue their efforts to 26 resolve this matter without the necessity of briefing and a formal Court ruling, or to narrow the 27 scope of briefing. 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF 115) 1 7. The Parties have now resolved in principal the issues that are the subject of TGS 2 Notice of Motion to Compel (ECF No. 115), and have agreed to and hereby do jointly ask the Court 3 to relieve the parties of any further briefing with respect to TGS’s Notice of Motion to Compel (ECF 4 No. 115), given that TGS hereby withdraws the Notice of Motion, without prejudice to its rights to 5 seek further relief should circumstances change. 6 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 8 9 10 Dated: October 18, 2018 By: /s/ Kurt A. Kappes (as authorized on []) James N. Nelson Kurt A. Kappes Michael D. Lane Michelle L. DuCharme Sean A. Newland Attorneys for Plaintiff, Counter-Plaintiff and Defendant ROADRUNNER INTERMODAL SERVICES, LLC and Defendant CENTRAL CAL TRANSPORTATION, LLC 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Dated: October 18, 2018 18 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP By: /s/ Scott J. Ivy (as authorized on []) Scott J. Ivy Shane G. Smith Attorneys for Defendant, T.G.S. TRANSPORTATION, INC., a California corporation 19 23 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP ORDER The parties are HEREBY RELIEVED of any further briefing with respect to TGS’s Notice of Motion to Compel (ECF No. 115), and the motion is deemed withdrawn without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 22, 2018 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF 115)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?