Roadrunner Intermodal Services, LLC v. T.G.S. Transportation, Inc.

Filing 19

Joint STIPULATION to Extend Defendant T.G.S. Transportation, Inc's Time to Respond to Complaint; ORDER: that the deadline for TGS to respond to Roadrunners Complaint be extended to September 1, 2017. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/29/2017. (Herman, H)

1 GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP
Kurt A. Kappes, #146384
[e-mail]
2
Michael D. Lane, #239517
[e-mail]
3
Sean A. Newland, # 300928
[e-mail]
4
1201 K. Street, Suite 1100
5 Sacramento, CA 95814-3938
Telephone:
[phone]
6 Facsimile:
[phone]
7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Roadrunner
Intermodal Services, LLC
8
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
9 WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
Scott J. Ivy, #197681
[e-mail]
10
Shane G. Smith, #272630
[e-mail]
11
7647 North Fresno Street
12 Fresno, California 93720
Telephone:
[phone]
13 Facsimile:
[phone]
14 Attorneys for Defendant, T.G.S.
TRANSPORTATION, INC.
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
18
19
ROADRUNNER INTERMODAL
20 SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
21
Plaintiff,
22
v.
23
T.G.S. TRANSPORTATION, INC., a
24 California corporation, and DOES 1-10,
25

Case No. 1:17-cv-01056-DAD-BAM
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEFENDANT T.G.S.
TRANSPORTATION, INC’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER

Defendants.

26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET
FRESNO, CA 93720

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TGS’ TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT

1

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a), Plaintiff Roadrunner Intermodal Services, LLC

2 (“Roadrunner”) and Defendant T.G.S. Transportation, Inc. (“TGS”) jointly submit this stipulation and
3 proposed order requesting that the Court extend Defendant’s time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint
4 filed on August 7, 2017. (ECF 1.) The Parties respectfully submit that their request is supported by
5 good cause. Specifically, pursuant to Paragraph 1.C of the Court’s Standing Order, the Parties have
6 engaged in a good faith meet and confer regarding a Rule 12 motion contemplated by TGS in response
7 to the Complaint. They have not, however, been able to reach any agreement ahead of TGS’ deadline
8 to file a responsive paper on Tuesday, August 29, 2017. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1).
9

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Roadrunner and TGS, through

10 their undersigned counsel, that the deadline for TGS to respond to Roadrunner’s Complaint be
11 extended to September 1, 2017.
12

Respectfully submitted,
GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP

13
14

Dated: August 28, 2017

15
16

By:

17
18
19

/s/ Michael D. Lane
Kurt A. Kappes
Michael D. Lane
Sean A. Newland
Attorneys for Plaintiff, ROADRUNNER
INTERMODAL SERVICES, LLC

20
21 Dated: August 28, 2017

McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET
FRESNO, CA 93720

By:

/s/ Shane G. Smith
Scott J. Ivy
Shane G.Smith
Attorneys for Defendant, T.G.S.
TRANSPORTATION, INC.

1

-oOo-

2

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

3

I hereby attest that concurrence has been obtained from Michael Lane, counsel for Plaintiff

4 Roadrunner Intermodal Services, LLC, as indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e5 filed document.
6

/s/ Shane G. Smith

7

Shane G. Smith

8
-oOo9
[Proposed] ORDER
10
IT IS SO ORDERED, pursuant to stipulation of the parties and Federal Rule of Civil
11
Procedure 12(a), that the deadline for Defendant T.G.S. Transportation, Inc. to respond to Plaintiff
12
Roadrunner Intermodal Services, LLC’s Complaint is extended to September 1, 2017.
13
14
Dated:
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
7647 NORTH FRESNO STREET
FRESNO, CA 93720

August 29, 2017

/s/ Barbara

A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE