Roadrunner Intermodal Services, LLC v. T.G.S. Transportation, Inc.
Filing
96
STIPULATION and ORDER to File Amended Complaint: Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, Plaintiff Jeffrey Cox may file and serve a First Amended Complaint. Within twenty-one (21) days after filing and service of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, Defendants Roadrunner Intermodal Services, LLC, and Central Cal Transportation, LLC may file a response to the First Amended Complaint. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/27/2018. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
Howard A. Sagaser, State Bar No. 72492
Ian B. Wieland, State Bar No. 285721
Christopher M. Rusca, State Bar No. 264608
SAGASER, WATKINS & WIELAND, PC
5260 North Palm Avenue, Suite 400
Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: (559) 421-7000
Facsimile: (559) 473-1483
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter Defendant
JEFFREY COX
James N. Nelson – SBN 116442
Michelle L. DuCharme – SBN 285572
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
1201 K Street, Suite 1100
Sacramento, CA 95814-3938
Telephone: (916) 442-1111
Facsimile: (916) 448-1709
nelsonj@gtlaw.com
ducharmem@gtlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants
ROADRUNNER INTERMODAL SERVICES, LLC
and CENTRAL CAL TRANSPORTATION, LLC
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
Lead Case No. 1:17-cv-01056-DAD-BAM
(consolidated)
JEFFREY COX,
Plaintiff,
18
19
v.
20
ROADRUNNER INTERMODAL SERVICES,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
CENTRAL CAL TRANSPORTATION, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company, and
DOES 1 through 50,
21
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE
AMENDED COMPLAINT
State Action Filed: July 25, 2017
Removal Filed: September 7, 2017
ROADRUNNER INTERMODAL SERVICES,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendant and CounterPlaintiff,
26
27
Member Case No. 1:17-cv-01207-DAD-BAM
v.
28
30
31
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
JEFFREY COX,
Plaintiff and CounterDefendant.
2
3
4
ROADRUNNER INTERMODAL SERVICES,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
5
Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
T.G.S. TRANSPORTATION, INC., a
California corporation, and DOES 1-10,
8
Defendants.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
31
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
Plaintiff Jeffrey Cox (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Roadrunner Intermodal Services, LLC,
2
and Central Cal Transportation, LLC (“Defendants”) (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through
3
their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
4
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a separate lawsuit against Defendants, titled Jeffrey Cox, et al.
5
v. Roadrunner Intermodal Services, LLC, et al., Case No. BC669711, that is currently pending
6
before the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles;
7
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has agreed to dismiss his Labor Code section 1102.5 retaliation cause
8
of action against Defendants in his lawsuit that is currently pending before the Superior Court of
9
California, County of Los Angeles in order to plead the same in this action and deal with all
10
employment-related claims against Defendants in a single action;
11
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has indicated an intention to seek leave to file a First Amended
12
Complaint to add a new claim here that would be the same as the claims of retaliation in violation
13
of Labor Code section 1102.5 and the parties agree that if permitted to do so, the statute of
14
limitations on the retaliation claim will be calculated based on the date the Los Angeles County
15
Superior Court case referenced above was originally filed, February 16, 2017. See attached;
16
WHEREAS, Defendants have agreed that they will waive any and all claims for attorney
17
fees and costs against David Chidester in the case titled Jeffrey Cox, et al. v. Roadrunner
18
Intermodal Services, LLC, et al., Case No. BC669711, that is currently pending before the
19
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles;
WHEREAS, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) permits any party to file an amended
20
21
pleading “with the opposing party’s written consent;”
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
30
31
1
Case No. 1:17-cv-01056-DAD-BAM
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
BASED ON THE FOREGOING, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
2
1.
3
4
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Plaintiff may file and serve a First
Amended Complaint following the Court’s approval of this Stipulation; and
2.
Within twenty-one (21) days after filing and service of Plaintiff’s First Amended
5
Complaint, Defendants may file a response to the First Amended Complaint.
6
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
7
8
DATED: February 22, 2018
SAGASER, WATKINS & WIELAND PC
9
10
By: /s/ Ian B. Wieland (as authorized on February 22, 2018)
Howard A. Sagaser
Ian B. Wieland
Christopher M. Rusca
Attorneys for JEFFREY COX
11
12
13
14
DATED: February 22, 2018
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
15
By: /s/ James M. Nelson
James M. Nelson
Michelle L. DuCharme
Attorneys for ROADRUNNER INTERMODAL
SERVICES, LLC and CENTRAL CAL
TRANSPORTATION, LLC
16
17
18
19
ORDER
20
21
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, Plaintiff Jeffrey Cox may file and serve a First Amended
22
Complaint. Within twenty-one (21) days after filing and service of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint,
23
Defendants Roadrunner Intermodal Services, LLC, and Central Cal Transportation, LLC may file a
24
response to the First Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
Dated:
February 27, 2018
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
30
31
2
Case No. 1:17-cv-01056-DAD-BAM
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
31
3
Case No. 1:17-cv-01056-DAD-BAM
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?