Cuadra v. George Brown Sports Club-Palm, Inc. et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for a continuance of the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 11/16/2017 and CONTINUING it to 3/7/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/13/2017. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
4 STEVEN S. DIAS #251138 ROBIN M. HALL #256520 WILD, CARTER & TIPTON 246 West Shaw Avenue Fresno, California 93704 Telephone: (559) 224-2131 Facsimile: (559) 354-0318 sdias@wctlaw.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Mario Cuadra 1 2 3 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 A Professional Corporation 246 WEST SHAW AVENUE FRESNO, CA 93704 WILD, CARTER & TIPTON 9 MARIO CUADRA, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, v. GEORGE BROWN SPORTS CLUBPALM, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:17-CV-01063 DAD EPG STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Date: November 16, 2017 Time: 9:00 a.m. Judge: Erica P. Grosjean 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, MARIO CUADRA, and Defendants, JOHNSTON CONTRACTING, INC. and GEORGE BROWN SPORTS CLUB PALM LLC and GEORGE BROWN SPORTS CLUB, INC., by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 23 The parties have met and conferred as required by Federal Rules 16(b) and 26(f) and 24 have been working diligently toward preparing the Joint Mandatory Scheduling Report. The 25 parties that have already been identified hereby jointly request a ninety (90) day continuance of 26 the November 16, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. Initial Scheduling Conference based upon the following: 27 28 -1__________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 1 1. Defendant, JOHNSTON CONTRACTING, INC., by and through their 2 attorneys, filed a Third Party Complaint against WILLIAM McKEAND dba TEC SPEC; 3 WCM, INC. dba TEC SPEC, a California corporation and ROES 1 to 50, inclusive on October 4 20, 2017 (“Third Party Defendant”). 5 6 7 8 10 A Professional Corporation 246 WEST SHAW AVENUE FRESNO, CA 93704 WILD, CARTER & TIPTON 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2. None of the Third Party Defendants have filed a responsive pleading to the Third Party Complaint of JOHNSTON CONTRACTING, INC. 3. On October 31, 2017, Third Party Defendant WILLIAM McKEAND dba TEC SPEC was served with the Third Party Summons and Third Party Complaint. 4. On October 25, 2017, Third Party Defendant, WCM, INC. dba TEC SPEC, a California corporation was served with the Third Party Summon and Third Party Complaint. 5. The Third Party Defendants recently served with the Third Party Summons and Third Party Complaint will have 21 days from the date they were served to file their Answers. The statute for the Third Party Defendant WILLIAM McKEAND dba TEC SPEC Answer will not expire until after the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for November 16, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., and Third Party Defendant, WCM, INC. dba TEC SPEC’s Answer is not due until the day before the currently set Initial Scheduling Conference. 6. Plaintiff has been in contact with defense counsel for GEORGE BROWN SPORTS CLUB requesting information regarding the manufacturer of the L-shaped, hold-up shower seat at issue. Plaintiff intends on amending the Complaint to include the manufacturer of the seat. 7. Plaintiff intends dismiss GEORGE BROWN SPORTS CLUB-PALM, INC. as 21 the proper name for this Defendant will need to be amended in the First Amended Complaint to 22 be GEORGE BROWN SPORTS CLUB PALM LLC. 23 24 25 26 27 THEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that the Initial Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for November 16, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. be continued at least 90 days to allow all Defendants to be properly named, served with the Amended Summons and Amended Complaint and allowed time to file their respective Answers. This will allow all parties a 28 -2__________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 1 chance to participate in the Initial Scheduling Conference once they are identified and joined in 2 this lawsuit. 3 4 This Stipulation may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be 5 deemed an original Stipulation, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same 6 instrument. This Stipulation may be executed via facsimile and the signatures thereon shall be 7 deemed original signatures. 8 Dated: November 9, 2017. By: /S/ Steven S. Dias STEVEN S. DIAS Attorney for Plaintiff 10 A Professional Corporation 246 WEST SHAW AVENUE FRESNO, CA 93704 WILD, CARTER & TIPTON 9 11 12 Dated: November 9, 2017. By: /S/ Anthony N. DeMaria ANTHONY N. DeMARIA Attorney for Defendants, GEORGE BROWN SPORTS CLUB PALM LLC, et al. Dated: November 9, 2017. By: ___________________________________ T. PATRICK LONG or WARREN B. CAMPBELL Attorney for Defendant, JOHNSTON 13 14 15 16 17 18 CONTRACTING, INC. 19 20 21 22 23 24 Pursuant to the request of the parties, the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for November 16, 2017, is CONTINUED and will now be held on March 7, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. A joint scheduling report is due one full week prior to the conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 Dated: November 13, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 -3__________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 A Professional Corporation 246 WEST SHAW AVENUE FRESNO, CA 93704 WILD, CARTER & TIPTON 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4__________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?