Perez v. Matevousian

Filing 17

ORDER Setting a Briefing Schedule for Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 06/05/2018. Deadline 6/26/2018.(Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE ANGEL PEREZ, 12 13 14 15 16 Case No. 1:17-cv-01075-JDP Petitioner, v. ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, Respondent. ORDER SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. No. 15) 17 18 Respondent moves to dismiss pro se petitioner Jose Angel Perez’s petition for a writ of 19 habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. No. 15.) Respondent contends that the 20 petition is moot because the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina recently 21 amended its April 11, 1994 judgment to reflect that the charge against petitioner under 22 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)—possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking crime—had been vacated. 23 (See Doc. No. 15-1, at 17 (Amended Judgment).) Petitioner’s deadline for responding to the 24 motion to dismiss—Wednesday, April 25, 2018—has passed, but the court has not received a 25 response from petitioner. Although the court will allow petitioner another opportunity to respond 26 to the motion to dismiss, petitioner’s failure to respond may result in the dismissal of this case. 27 28 1 1 Accordingly, 2 1. Petitioner’s new deadline for responding to respondent’s motion to dismiss is 3 4 Tuesday, June 26, 2018; and 2. Petitioner’s failure to respond to the motion to dismiss may result in dismissal of this 5 case. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 5, 2018 /s/ 9 Jeremy D. Peterson UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?