Romero v. Agrium, Inc.
Filing
10
STIPULATION and ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES: Settlement Conference currently set for 4/2/2019 is re-set for 6/20/2019 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Pretrial Conference currently set for 3/18/2019 is re-set for 6/24/2019 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd, Jury Trial currently set for 5/18/2019 is re-set for 8/20/2019 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/31/2018. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ANTHONY J. DECRISTOFORO, SBN 166171
anthony.decristoforo@ogletree.com
KELSEY A. WEBBER, SBN 303721
kelsey.webber@ogletree.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Esquire Plaza
1215 K Street 17th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone:
916.840.3150
Facsimile:
916.840.3159
Attorneys for Defendant AGRIUM, INC. (erroneously sued as
Agrium, Inc. dba Crop Production Services, Inc.)
8
9
10
11
12
JOSHUA F. RICHTEL, ESQ.
TUTTLE & McCLOSKEY
750 E. Bullard, Suite 101
Fresno, CA 93710
Tel.: (559) 437-1770
Fax: (559) 437-0150
Attorneys for Plaintiff, RICHARD ROMERO
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
RICHARD ROMERO
Plaintiff,
18
v.
19
20
AGRIUM, INC. dba CROP PRODUCTION
SERVICES, INC. and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
Case No. 1:17-cv-01080-DAD-SKO
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL
DATES
(Doc. 9)
21
Defendant.
22
23
24
////
25
////
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
Case No. 1:17-cv-01080-DAD-SKO
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES
1
Defendant AGRIUM, INC. (erroneously sued as Agrium, Inc. dba Crop Production Services,
2
Inc.) (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Richard Romero (“Plaintiff”) (collectively, “Parties”), through their
3
counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
4
5
WHEREAS, the Court’s Scheduling Order dated November 15, 2017, initially set the
following dates in this action:
6
7
Event
Date
8
Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off
September 28, 2018
9
Expert Disclosures
October 10, 2018
10
Rebuttal Expert Disclosures
October 25, 2018
11
Expert Discovery
November 15, 2018
12
Last day to File Non-Dispositive Motion
November 21, 2018
13
Last day to hear Non-Dispositive Motions
December 19, 2018
14
Last day to File Dispositive Motion
November 26, 2018
15
Hearing on Dispositive Motion
January 7, 2019
16
Settlement Conference
April 2, 2019 at 1:00 p.m. Courtroom 10
17
Pretrial Conference
March 18, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. Courtroom 5
18
Trial
May 14, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. Courtroom 5
19
WHEREAS, the Parties have engaged in discovery and have diligently litigated this action;
20
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to participate in private mediation;
21
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred on the subject of continuing the trial, and
22
pretrial dates, and stipulate and request that the Court extend the trial and pretrial dates by 90 days
23
to allow the Parties sufficient time to schedule and attend mediation, to complete additional
24
discovery, if necessary, and to initiate any necessary motion practice;
25
WHEREAS, no party has previously requested a continuance of the trial in this case; this is
26
the Parties’ first request for a continuance of the trial and related dates; the requested continuance is
27
not being sought for the purpose of delay, but rather, to promote the interest of judicial efficiency
28
and economy; and no party will be prejudiced by the requested continuance.
2
Case No. 1:17-cv-01080-DAD-SKO
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES
1
2
ACCORDINGLY, FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND
AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
3
The Parties request that the Court grant the [Proposed] Order for Continuance of Trial and
4
Pretrial Dates, and continue all dates as set forth in the Amended Schedule of Trial and Pretrial
5
Deadlines attached as Exhibit A, or as the Court otherwise deems convenient and appropriate.
6
7
DATED: August 29, 2018
8
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
9
By: /s/ Kelsey A. Webber
Anthony J. DeCristoforo
Kelsey A. Webber
Attorneys for Defendant AGRIUM, INC.
(erroneously sued as Agrium, Inc. dba Crop
Production Services, Inc.)
10
11
12
13
14
DATED: August 29, 2018
15
TUTTLE & MCCLOSKEY
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
16
By: /s/ Joshua F. Richtel
JOSHUA F. RICHTEL
Attorneys For Plaintiff RICHARD ROMERO
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(1), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has
been obtained from the other signator.
DATED: August 29, 2018
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
24
25
26
27
By: /s/ Kelsey A. Webber
Anthony J. DeCristoforo
Kelsey A. Webber
Attorneys for Defendant AGRIUM, INC.
(erroneously sued as Agrium, Inc. dba Crop
Production Services, Inc.)
28
3
Case No. 1:17-cv-01080-DAD-SKO
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES
1
EXHIBIT A
2
Amended Schedule of Trial and Pretrial Dates
3
Event
Prior Date
Continued Date
4
Non-Expert Discovery Cut-
September 28, 2018
December 28, 2018
5
Off
6
Expert Disclosures
October 10, 2018
January 16, 2019
7
Rebuttal Expert Disclosures
October 25, 2018
January 31, 2019
8
Expert Discovery
November 15, 2018
February 21, 2019
9
Last day to File Non-
November 21, 2018
February 27, 2019
December 19, 2018
March 27, 2019
November 26, 2018
March 4, 2019
January 7, 2019
April 8, 2019
10
Dispositive Motion
11
Last day to hear Non-
12
Dispositive Motions
13
Last day to File Dispositive
14
Motion
15
Hearing on Dispositive
16
Motion
17
Settlement Conference
April 2, 2019 at 1:00 p.m.
Courtroom 10
July 2, 2019 at 1:00 p.m.
Courtroom 10
Pretrial Conference
March 18, 2019 at 1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 5
June 17, 2019 at 1:30
p.m. Courtroom 5
Trial
May 14, 2019 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 5
August 13, 2019 at 8:30
a.m. Courtroom 5
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Case No. 1:17-cv-01080-DAD-SKO
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES
1
ORDER
2
The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation and Request for Continuance of Trial and
3
Pretrial Dates and Deadlines filed by Defendant AGRIUM, INC. (erroneously sued as Agrium, Inc.
4
5
dba Crop Production Services, Inc.) (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Richard Romero (“Plaintiff”)
(collectively, “Parties”), through their counsel of record, requesting that the Court enter an Order
6
continuing the trial and pretrial dates and deadlines in this action by 90 days. (Doc. 9)
7
8
Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, with good cause shown, the Court hereby ORDERS that
the Scheduling Order (Doc. 8) is modified as follows:1
9
10
Event
Continued Date
September 28, 2018
December 28, 2018
Expert Disclosures
October 10, 2018
January 16, 2019
Rebuttal Expert Disclosures
October 25, 2018
January 31, 2019
Expert Discovery
November 15, 2018
February 21, 2019
Last day to File Non-
November 21, 2018
February 27, 2019
December 19, 2018
March 27, 2019
November 26, 2018
March 4, 2019
January 7, 2019
April 16, 2019
Settlement Conference
April 2, 2019 at 1:00 p.m.
Courtroom 10
June 20, 2019 at 1:00
p.m. Courtroom 10
Pretrial Conference
12
Prior Date
Non-Expert Discovery Cut-
11
March 18, 2019 at 1:30 p.m.
June 24, 2019 at 1:30
Off
13
14
15
16
17
Dispositive Motion
18
Last day to hear Non-
19
Dispositive Motions
20
Last day to File Dispositive
21
Motion
22
Hearing on Dispositive
23
Motion
24
25
26
27
Several of the dates proposed by the parties have been adjusted to comport with the Court’s calendar, to allow the
Court adequate time to rule on dispositive motions, and to permit the parties sufficient time to prepare their pretrial
submissions and for trial.
1
28
1
ORDER
Case No. 1:17-cv-01080-DAD-SKO
1
Courtroom 5
2
Trial
3
4
p.m. Courtroom 5
May 14, 2019 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 5
August 20, 2019 at 1:00
p.m. Courtroom 5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated:
August 31, 2018
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER
Case No. 1:17-cv-01080-DAD-SKO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?