Romero v. Agrium, Inc.

Filing 10

STIPULATION and ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES: Settlement Conference currently set for 4/2/2019 is re-set for 6/20/2019 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Pretrial Conference currently set for 3/18/2019 is re-set for 6/24/2019 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd, Jury Trial currently set for 5/18/2019 is re-set for 8/20/2019 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/31/2018. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ANTHONY J. DECRISTOFORO, SBN 166171 anthony.decristoforo@ogletree.com KELSEY A. WEBBER, SBN 303721 kelsey.webber@ogletree.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Esquire Plaza 1215 K Street 17th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916.840.3150 Facsimile: 916.840.3159 Attorneys for Defendant AGRIUM, INC. (erroneously sued as Agrium, Inc. dba Crop Production Services, Inc.) 8 9 10 11 12 JOSHUA F. RICHTEL, ESQ. TUTTLE & McCLOSKEY 750 E. Bullard, Suite 101 Fresno, CA 93710 Tel.: (559) 437-1770 Fax: (559) 437-0150 Attorneys for Plaintiff, RICHARD ROMERO 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 RICHARD ROMERO Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 20 AGRIUM, INC. dba CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC. and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Case No. 1:17-cv-01080-DAD-SKO STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES (Doc. 9) 21 Defendant. 22 23 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 Case No. 1:17-cv-01080-DAD-SKO STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES 1 Defendant AGRIUM, INC. (erroneously sued as Agrium, Inc. dba Crop Production Services, 2 Inc.) (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Richard Romero (“Plaintiff”) (collectively, “Parties”), through their 3 counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 4 5 WHEREAS, the Court’s Scheduling Order dated November 15, 2017, initially set the following dates in this action: 6 7 Event Date 8 Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off September 28, 2018 9 Expert Disclosures October 10, 2018 10 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures October 25, 2018 11 Expert Discovery November 15, 2018 12 Last day to File Non-Dispositive Motion November 21, 2018 13 Last day to hear Non-Dispositive Motions December 19, 2018 14 Last day to File Dispositive Motion November 26, 2018 15 Hearing on Dispositive Motion January 7, 2019 16 Settlement Conference April 2, 2019 at 1:00 p.m. Courtroom 10 17 Pretrial Conference March 18, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. Courtroom 5 18 Trial May 14, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. Courtroom 5 19 WHEREAS, the Parties have engaged in discovery and have diligently litigated this action; 20 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to participate in private mediation; 21 WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred on the subject of continuing the trial, and 22 pretrial dates, and stipulate and request that the Court extend the trial and pretrial dates by 90 days 23 to allow the Parties sufficient time to schedule and attend mediation, to complete additional 24 discovery, if necessary, and to initiate any necessary motion practice; 25 WHEREAS, no party has previously requested a continuance of the trial in this case; this is 26 the Parties’ first request for a continuance of the trial and related dates; the requested continuance is 27 not being sought for the purpose of delay, but rather, to promote the interest of judicial efficiency 28 and economy; and no party will be prejudiced by the requested continuance. 2 Case No. 1:17-cv-01080-DAD-SKO STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES 1 2 ACCORDINGLY, FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 3 The Parties request that the Court grant the [Proposed] Order for Continuance of Trial and 4 Pretrial Dates, and continue all dates as set forth in the Amended Schedule of Trial and Pretrial 5 Deadlines attached as Exhibit A, or as the Court otherwise deems convenient and appropriate. 6 7 DATED: August 29, 2018 8 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 9 By: /s/ Kelsey A. Webber Anthony J. DeCristoforo Kelsey A. Webber Attorneys for Defendant AGRIUM, INC. (erroneously sued as Agrium, Inc. dba Crop Production Services, Inc.) 10 11 12 13 14 DATED: August 29, 2018 15 TUTTLE & MCCLOSKEY A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 16 By: /s/ Joshua F. Richtel JOSHUA F. RICHTEL Attorneys For Plaintiff RICHARD ROMERO 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ATTESTATION Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(1), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signator. DATED: August 29, 2018 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 24 25 26 27 By: /s/ Kelsey A. Webber Anthony J. DeCristoforo Kelsey A. Webber Attorneys for Defendant AGRIUM, INC. (erroneously sued as Agrium, Inc. dba Crop Production Services, Inc.) 28 3 Case No. 1:17-cv-01080-DAD-SKO STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES 1 EXHIBIT A 2 Amended Schedule of Trial and Pretrial Dates 3 Event Prior Date Continued Date 4 Non-Expert Discovery Cut- September 28, 2018 December 28, 2018 5 Off 6 Expert Disclosures October 10, 2018 January 16, 2019 7 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures October 25, 2018 January 31, 2019 8 Expert Discovery November 15, 2018 February 21, 2019 9 Last day to File Non- November 21, 2018 February 27, 2019 December 19, 2018 March 27, 2019 November 26, 2018 March 4, 2019 January 7, 2019 April 8, 2019 10 Dispositive Motion 11 Last day to hear Non- 12 Dispositive Motions 13 Last day to File Dispositive 14 Motion 15 Hearing on Dispositive 16 Motion 17 Settlement Conference April 2, 2019 at 1:00 p.m. Courtroom 10 July 2, 2019 at 1:00 p.m. Courtroom 10 Pretrial Conference March 18, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. Courtroom 5 June 17, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. Courtroom 5 Trial May 14, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. Courtroom 5 August 13, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. Courtroom 5 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Case No. 1:17-cv-01080-DAD-SKO STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES 1 ORDER 2 The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation and Request for Continuance of Trial and 3 Pretrial Dates and Deadlines filed by Defendant AGRIUM, INC. (erroneously sued as Agrium, Inc. 4 5 dba Crop Production Services, Inc.) (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Richard Romero (“Plaintiff”) (collectively, “Parties”), through their counsel of record, requesting that the Court enter an Order 6 continuing the trial and pretrial dates and deadlines in this action by 90 days. (Doc. 9) 7 8 Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, with good cause shown, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Scheduling Order (Doc. 8) is modified as follows:1 9 10 Event Continued Date September 28, 2018 December 28, 2018 Expert Disclosures October 10, 2018 January 16, 2019 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures October 25, 2018 January 31, 2019 Expert Discovery November 15, 2018 February 21, 2019 Last day to File Non- November 21, 2018 February 27, 2019 December 19, 2018 March 27, 2019 November 26, 2018 March 4, 2019 January 7, 2019 April 16, 2019 Settlement Conference April 2, 2019 at 1:00 p.m. Courtroom 10 June 20, 2019 at 1:00 p.m. Courtroom 10 Pretrial Conference 12 Prior Date Non-Expert Discovery Cut- 11 March 18, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. June 24, 2019 at 1:30 Off 13 14 15 16 17 Dispositive Motion 18 Last day to hear Non- 19 Dispositive Motions 20 Last day to File Dispositive 21 Motion 22 Hearing on Dispositive 23 Motion 24 25 26 27 Several of the dates proposed by the parties have been adjusted to comport with the Court’s calendar, to allow the Court adequate time to rule on dispositive motions, and to permit the parties sufficient time to prepare their pretrial submissions and for trial. 1 28 1 ORDER Case No. 1:17-cv-01080-DAD-SKO 1 Courtroom 5 2 Trial 3 4 p.m. Courtroom 5 May 14, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. Courtroom 5 August 20, 2019 at 1:00 p.m. Courtroom 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: August 31, 2018 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER Case No. 1:17-cv-01080-DAD-SKO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?