Richards v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC

Filing 16

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/11/2017. Consent/Decline due within 10 days. Pleading Amendment Deadline 2/5/2018. Class Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 11/20/2017; Non-Expert 8/10/2018; Expert 10/12/ 2018. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 4/18/2018 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 10/22/2018; Hearing by 11/19/2018. Class Certification Motion Deadlines: Filed by 12/12/2018; Opposition by 1/23/2019; Reply by 2/20/2019; Hearing set for 3/20/2019 at 10:00 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 THOMAS RICHARDS, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CORECIVIC OF TENNESSEE, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) 1: 17-CV-1094 - LJO - JLT SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16) Pleading Amendment Deadline: 2/5/2018 Class Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures: 11/20/2017 Non-Expert: 8/10/2018 Expert: 10/12/2018 Mid-Discovery Status Conference: 4/18/2018 at 9:00 a.m. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filing: 10/22/2018 Hearing: 11/19/2018 17 18 Class Certification Motion Deadlines: Filing: 12/12/2018 Opposition: 1/23/2019 Reply brief: 2/20/2019 Hearing: 3/20/2019 at 10:00 a.m. 19 20 21 22 I. Magistrate Judge Consent: 23 Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing 24 Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the newly adopted policy of the Fresno Division of 25 the Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are notified that for a trial date set before a 26 District Judge, they will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older civil case set on 27 the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset to a continued date. 28 The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that 1 1 of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize 2 criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge 3 may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of 4 Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States 5 Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit. The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United 6 7 States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the 8 Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance 9 notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern 10 District of California. Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to 11 12 conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel 13 SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating 14 whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. 15 II. Pleading Amendment Deadline Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or 16 17 motion to amend, no later than February 5, 2018. 18 III. 19 20 21 22 23 Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) on or before November 20, 2017. The parties are ordered to complete all class discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before August 10, 2018, and all class discovery pertaining to experts on or before October 12, 2018. The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before August 17, 24 2018, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before September 14, 2018. The written designation of 25 retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), 26 and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in 27 compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered 28 through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order. 2 The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts 1 2 and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions 3 included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may 4 include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony. The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party’s duty to timely supplement 5 6 disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced. A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for April 18, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. before the 7 8 Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, 9 California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the 10 conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to 11 The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be 12 completed as well as any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this 13 order. Counsel may appear via teleconference by dialing (888) 557-8511 and entering Access Code 14 1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk receives a written notice of the 15 intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date. 16 IV. 17 18 19 Pre-Trial Motion Schedule All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later than October 22, 2018, and heard on or before November 19, 2018. Non-dispositive motions are heard before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States 20 Magistrate Judge, at the United States Courthouse in Bakersfield, California. No motion to amend or 21 stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it is filed at least one week 22 before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written discovery motions shall be 23 filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. 24 A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort 25 to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party 26 promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be 27 the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To 28 schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan 3 1 Hall, at (661) 326-6620 or via email at Counsel must comply with Local 2 Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and 3 dropped from the Court’s calendar. Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via teleconference by dialing (888) 557- 4 5 8511 and entering Access Code 1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk 6 receives a written notice of the intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before the 7 noticed hearing date. 8 V. Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be heard by the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill, United 9 10 States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 11 and Local Rules 230 and 260. 12 At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary 13 adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues 14 to be raised in the motion. 15 The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a 16 question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole 17 or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the 18 issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the 19 expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts. The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed 20 21 statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of 22 undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be 23 deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint 24 statement of undisputed facts. In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred 25 26 as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to 27 comply may result in the motion being stricken. 28 /// 4 1 VI. Motion for Class Certification The motion for class certification SHALL be filed no later than December 12, 2018. 2 3 Opposition to the motion SHALL be filed no later than January 23, 2019. During the interval 4 between the filing of the motion and the deadline for the opposition, the defendant may conduct 5 discovery as to the evidence relied upon by the plaintiff for the motion for class certification. Neither the motion nor the opposition SHALL exceed 30 pages, exclusive of evidence and 6 7 evidentiary objections, unless leave is granted by the Court prior to the filing. Any reply SHALL be 8 filed no later than February 20, 2019, and shall not exceed 15 pages, exclusive of evidentiary 9 objections. During the interval between the filing of the opposition and the deadline for the reply, the 10 plaintiff may conduct discovery as to the evidence relied upon by defendant for the opposition to the 11 motion for class certification. 12 Any objections to the evidence SHALL be filed at the same time as the opposition (for 13 Defendant) and the reply (for Plaintiff).1 A hard-copy, courtesy copy of all filings related to the class 14 motion SHALL be sent via overnight mail to the Chambers of Judge Thurston the same day the filing 15 is submitted. All of the pages of evidence in the hard copy SHALL be numbered, tabbed and indexed. 16 The hearing on the motion for class certification is set on March 20, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. 17 before Judge Thurston at the United States Courthouse, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA. 18 VII. 19 Settlement Conference The parties may file a joint written request for a settlement conference if they believe the action 20 is in a settlement posture and a conference with the Court would be fruitful. The parties shall include 21 proposed dates for the conference in the request. At that time, the settlement conference will be set 22 with Magistrate Judge Thurston. If any party prefers that the settlement conference be conducted 23 by a different judicial officer, that party is directed to notify the Court no later than 60 days in 24 advance of the requested conference to allow sufficient time for another judicial officer to be 25 assigned to handle the conference. 26 VIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure 27 28 All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1 No motions to strike evidence will be entertained. If the Court sustains an objection to a piece of evidence, the evidence will not be considered. 5 1 and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any 2 amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently 3 handle its increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal 4 Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California. 5 IX. 6 Effect of this Order The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda 7 most suitable to dispose of this case. If the parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in 8 this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered to notify the court immediately of that fact so that 9 adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by subsequent status conference. 10 The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a 11 showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations 12 extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by 13 affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause 14 for granting the relief requested. 15 Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. 16 17 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 11, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?