United States of America v. Edwards, et al.

Filing 32

STIPULATION and ORDER to CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 7/3/2018, is CONTINUED to 8/14/2018, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties shall file their joint scheduling report by no later than 8/7/2018. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/26/2018. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 14 15 Case No. 1:17-CV-01105-AWI-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE v. 16 17 18 DAVID J. EDWARDS, et al., (Doc. 30.) Defendants. 19 20 Pursuant to the “Stipulation and Joint Request to Continue Mandatory Scheduling 21 Conference and to Appear Telephonically at Mandatory Scheduling Conference” (Doc. 30) 22 between Plaintiff United States of America and Defendant State of California Franchise Tax 23 Board (collectively, “the Parties”), and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the 24 Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for July 3, 2018, is CONTINUED to August 14, 25 2018, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties 26 are to file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven days prior to the continued Mandatory 27 28 1 Order (Case No. 1:17-CV-01105-AWI-SKO) 1 Scheduling Conference. It is further ORDERED that the parties may appear telephonically at the 2 continued Mandatory Scheduling Conference. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 26, 2018 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Order (Case No. 1:17-CV-01105-AWI-SKO) .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?