United States of America v. Edwards, et al.

Filing 39

ORDER VACATING Mandatory Scheduling Conference and setting a Telephonic Status Conference set for 10/25/2018 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/9/2018. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 14 15 Case No. 1:17-CV-01105-AWI-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE v. 16 17 18 DAVID J. EDWARDS, et al., (Doc. 38.) Defendants. 19 20 On June 29, 2018, the Court entered an order of sale with respect to the property that is the 21 subject of the lawsuit (the “Subject Property”). (Doc. 34.) On August 9, 2018, the parties filed a 22 “Joint Request to Vacate Mandatory Scheduling Conference and Status Report,” requesting that 23 the Court vacate the Scheduling Conference as moot because “there are no remaining issues to 24 litigate in this action prior to the sale of the Subject Property.” (Doc. 38.) The Status Report 25 indicated that, as of the date of filing, the Subject Property had not yet been sold. (See id. at 2.) 26 Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for August 14, 27 2018, and SETS a telephonic status conference for October 25, 2018, at 10:15 AM before 28 1 Order (Case No. 1:17-CV-01105-AWI-SKO) 1 Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The Court further ORDERS that by no later than October 2 18, 2018, the parties shall file a joint status report apprising the Court of the status of this case 3 and, in particular, the sale of the Subject Property. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 9, 2018 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Order (Case No. 1:17-CV-01105-AWI-SKO) .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?