United States of America v. Edwards, et al.

Filing 66

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE WHY REMAINDER OF ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/6/2023. (10 DAY DEADLINE) (Apodaca, P)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4
5

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,

6
7
8

vs.

CASE NO. 1:17-cv-01105-AWI-SKO
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
REMAINDER OF ACTION SHOULD
NOT BE DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE

DAVID J. EDWARDS, ET AL.,

9

Defendant.

10
11
12

On March 5, 2020, the Court issued a stipulated order dismissing the Sixth Claim for

13 Relief in this action. Doc. No. 65. There has been no docketed activity in this case in the three
14 years since.
15

Plaintiff United States of America is, therefore, ORDERED to show in writing, within 10

16 calendar days of the date of electronic service of this order, why the remainder of this action
17 should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.
18

If the United States fails to make that showing, or otherwise provide a meaningful response

19 to this order within the period of time specified above, the remainder of this action will be
20 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and this action will be CLOSED without further notice to the
21 parties. See Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1423-24 (9th Cir. 1986) (affirming dismissal
22 with prejudice for lack of prosecution).
23
24 IT IS SO ORDERED.
25 Dated: March 6, 2023
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28