McEntee et al v. Ford Motor Company

Filing 8

ORDER on the 7 Joint Stipulation Extending Time for Defendants to Respond to the Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/14/2017. Response to complaint due by 10/13/2017. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ROGER MCENTEE, et al., Plaintiffs, 11 12 13 v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-01116- AWI - JLT ORDER ON THE JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (Doc. 7) 16 On September 12, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation for an extension of thirty days for 17 Ford Motor Company to file a response to Plaintiff’s complaint, indicating the defendant’s response 18 would be due October 13, 2017. (Doc. 7 at 2) Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the parties may 19 stipulation to an extension of time “no more than twenty-eight (28) to respond to a complaint … 20 without approval of the Court if the extension is signed on behalf of all parties who have appeared in 21 the action and are affected by the stipulation.” Any further extensions “must be approved by the 22 Court.” Id. 23 24 Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the stipulation, the Court ORDERS that the defendant SHALL file a response to the complaint no later than October 13, 2017. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 14, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?