McEntee et al v. Ford Motor Company

Filing 8

ORDER on the #7 Joint Stipulation Extending Time for Defendants to Respond to the Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/14/2017. Response to complaint due by 10/13/2017. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

ROGER MCENTEE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

11
12
13

v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
Defendant.

14
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:17-cv-01116- AWI - JLT
ORDER ON THE JOINT STIPULATION
EXTENDING THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO
RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
(Doc. 7)

16

On September 12, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation for an extension of thirty days for

17

Ford Motor Company to file a response to Plaintiff’s complaint, indicating the defendant’s response

18

would be due October 13, 2017. (Doc. 7 at 2) Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the parties may

19

stipulation to an extension of time “no more than twenty-eight (28) to respond to a complaint …

20

without approval of the Court if the extension is signed on behalf of all parties who have appeared in

21

the action and are affected by the stipulation.” Any further extensions “must be approved by the

22

Court.” Id.

23
24

Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the stipulation, the Court ORDERS that the defendant
SHALL file a response to the complaint no later than October 13, 2017.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 14, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2