LM v. Kern High School District

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER 20 to Extend Discovery Deadlines, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/2/2018. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DANIEL T. CLIFFORD, ESQ. – SBN 227632 DENNIS P. GALLAGHER, II, ESQ – SBN 301453 CLIFFORD & BROWN A Professional Corporation Attorneys at Law Bank of America Building 1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 900 Bakersfield, CA 93301-5230 Tel: (661) 322-6023 Fax: (661) 322-3508 [Filing fee exempt Gov. Code § 6103] Attorneys for Defendant, KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT 10 *** 11 LM, a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, GRISELDA MARTIN, 12 CASE NO. 1:17-CV-01123-DAD-JLT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON (Doc. 20) Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 15 16 KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, and DOES 1 to 100, Inclusive, Defendants. 17 The parties in the above-captioned matter, Plaintiff, LM, by and through his Guardian as Litem, 18 19 20 GRISELDA MARTIN (“Plaintiff”), by and through his attorneys of record, J. Miguel Flores of Rodriguez & Associates, and Defendant KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT (“Defendant”) (Plaintiff and Defendant are collectively referred to as the “Parties”), by and through its attorneys of record, 21 Daniel T. Clifford and Dennis P. Gallagher, II, of Clifford & Brown, P.C., hereby enter into this 22 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadlines, as follows: 23 RECITALS 24 WHEREAS the Parties have actively engaged in the discovery process to date, including the 25 exchange of written discovery requests and responses, setting of approximately eight depositions to 26 date, and a request by Defendant to inspect the home of Plaintiff; 27 WHEREAS the Parties anticipate the need for a significant amount of additional non-expert 28 1 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadlines 1 and expert discovery; 2 WHEREAS the Parties desire to extend the non-expert and expert discovery deadlines of July 3 27, 2018 and September 21, 2018, respectively, for approximately two months to allow for such further 4 discovery as the Parties deem appropriate. 5 6 7 8 9 STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties that the non-expert discovery deadline of July 27, 2018, be and hereby is continued to September 21, 2018. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between the Parties that the expert discovery deadline of September 21, 2018, be and hereby is continued to October 9, 2018. 10 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that all other dates and deadlines set by the Court in its 11 Scheduling Order dated November 20, 2017, remain on calendar or may be adjusted by the Court in its 12 discretion. 13 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that this stipulation may be signed in counterparts. 14 15 DATED: June 26, 2018 16 Dennis P. Gallagher, Esq. - /s/ 17 By ____________________________________ DANIEL T. CLIFFORD, ESQ. DENNIS P. GALLAGHER, II, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant, KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 18 19 20 21 CLIFFORD & BROWN DATED: June ___, 2018 RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES 22 23 24 25 26 By ____________________________________ DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, ESQ. J. MIGUEL FLORES, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff, L.M., by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Griselda Martin 27 28 2 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadlines 1 ORDER 2 Based upon the foregoing, the Court ORDERS1: 3 1. 4 21, 2018; 5 2. 6 October 9, 2018. 7 8 The non-expert discovery deadline of July 27, 2018, be and is continued to September The expert discovery deadline of September 21, 2018, be and hereby is continued to No other modifications to the case schedule are authorized and the Court anticipates granting no further amendments to the case schedule. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: July 2, 2018 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 In future, any stipulation to amend the case schedule SHALL describe the discovery that has not been completed and an explanation why it has not been completed. 3 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadlines

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?