Lange v. Target Corporation

Filing 10

Order on Stipulated Protective Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/2/2018. (Rosales, O)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

LAW OFFICE OF RANDY RUMPH
Randy Rumph, Esq. , State Bar No. 232235
218 H Street
Bakersfield, California 93304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SANDY LANGE
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
MANDANA MASSOUMI, State Bar No. 191359
[e-mail]
MATTHEW B. GOLPER, State Bar No. 275979
[e-mail]
695 Town Center Drive, 14th Floor
Costa Mesa, California 92626-1924
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
TARGET CORPORATION

12
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

17 SANDY LANGE
18
Plaintiff,
19

v.

20 TARGET CORPORATION, et al.
Defendants.
21

CASE NO: 1:17-CV-01131-LJO-JLT
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
(Doc. 9)

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
M ANATT , P HELPS &
P HILLIPS , LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
COSTA ME SA

ORDER ON STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order (“Joint Stipulation”) filed by Plaintiff Sandy

3

Lange and Defendant Target Corporation, filed with this Court on December 29, 2017 the Court

4

rules as follows:

5

1.

The stipulated protective order is GRANTED in PART;

6

2.

The protective order does not entitle the parties to file or lodge documents under

7

seal. Rather, the parties SHALL comply with Local Rule 141. Thus, paragraph V.2. of the

8

stipulation is deleted and, instead, Local Rule 141 SHALL guide the parties as to how to seek

9

authorization to file documents under seal. Likewise, the parties SHALL first obtain permission

10

to lodge evidence with the Court before delivering it to the Court.

11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 2, 2018

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
M ANATT , P HELPS &
P HILLIPS , LLP

2

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

ORDER ON STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

COSTA ME SA