Hoskins v. Ngyen
Filing
21
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Second 20 Request to Modify the Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/20/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY HOSKINS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
L. NGYEN, et. al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Case No.: 1:17-cv-01133-SAB (PC)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ SECOND
REQUEST TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING
ORDER
[ECF No. 20]
Plaintiff Anthony Hoskins is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Currently before the Court is Defendants’ second request to modify the scheduling order, filed
19
20
September 19, 2018. Defendants’ second request for an extension is based on the assignment of new
21
counsel on the case. The Court will grant Defendants’ second request and extend the discovery and
22
dispositive motion deadlines but not for the length of time proposed by Defendants as it appears
23
excessive simply because of reassignment of the case.
24
Good cause having been presented to the Court, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
1.
Defendants’ second request to modify the scheduling order is granted;
26
2.
The deadline for completion of all discovery, including motions to compel is extended
27
to February 1, 2019; and
28
///
1
3.
1
2
The deadline for filing all dispositive motions (other than a motion for summary
judgment for failure to exhaust) is extended to April 1, 2019.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
6
September 20, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?